AAA73Pilot
Veteran
- Jul 18, 2007
- 1,513
- 0
Yep you're right. Cut the line to the mother ship and problem solved. Great "Union" isn't it? NOT!!......... a very high priority for immediate assistance from Alpa.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
Yep you're right. Cut the line to the mother ship and problem solved. Great "Union" isn't it? NOT!!......... a very high priority for immediate assistance from Alpa.
Not laughing, just hoping USAPA prevails. But that's nothing new.I hate to interrupt all the usapians, .......... but just be careful. You may get what you are wishing for.
Yeah, yeah, I know your laughing and mocking me at the moment, thats ok. Go ahead, let it all out.
So successful DFR suits aren't as rare as some "experts" will have us believe.
Not against Alpa it seems....
Exactly! If a large CBA with money to burn (waste) not only a bunch of lawyers but mailing extraneous messages has to settle then there is hope that DFR lawsuits can rightly be won in other venues with different organizations if they don't live up to their representational duties.
Gasp!!...You can NOT even begin to be suggesting that ALpa's not lived up to their representational duties!!?? While you're rejoicing in the success of the DFR suits against Alpa...realize that among other items, the bogus list passed that showed MDA people as "furloughed",....might well just come back to sink your little Nic ship completely when things are resolved in court. There's a great deal more going on than you've chosen to make yourself aware of.
Have a good evening...and save me some of the Koolaide....
East,
With all due respect, just what do you think will happen to 90% of the AWA seniority list if USAPA wins and does enforce their DOH stand according to their C&BL's? Even if they create a fence, which is what they suggest, it would effectively limit us to the west. Well, what if the system out west continues to remain stagnate? What if Parker wants all future aircraft to go east? USAPA was asked this question during the PHX road show and their answer was we would be able to bid out east but of course at our DOH. So this creates a situation where you could find a west block holding Captain wanting to move east but due to this DOH crap he will now find himself as a junior F/O most likely on reserve! How is this fair? This "fence" is nothing more than a way for USAPA to appear as though they are fair to all pilots but we can see through this... So again what do you think will happen to the pilots at AWA if USAPA is voted in? Actually, a better question is why do you spew rhetoric about real unions when you will effectively be voting for a "union", and I use the term loosely, that will screw 1800 pilots? I know, I know this is an exercise in futility...
Take care Mike...
How many times do we need to cover this ground?
To use your own phrase, "DOH Sux..cuz"; In my case it could very well mean downgrading to the right seat and finding myself junior to, and therefore on the street before, a multitude of east pilots who were furloughed at the merger date.
And before you come back with conditions and restrictions I again direct you to the east merger proposal. A stance that they have never been willing to modify, that directs that any furlough that occurs within 12 months of a recall will result in the furloughee returning to the street but conversely directs that after twelve months furloughs are to be by DOH/LOS.
Sorry but DOH is a land grab designed to make the west pilot pay the price for the east pilots' past career stagnation.
Though I agree circumstances have hosed the east group don't expect me to write you a check.
Back to the question never answered.
How can you not term an east furloughee and a west captain exchanging positions a windfall for the east pilot?
Let me guess . . . the furlough was ALPA's fault . . . and no USAPA-represented pilot will ever be furloughed, right?Here's the funny part... never even got a Fcuck you very much from ALPA after my 12 years of accident/incident-free service...just a furlough letter..plain and simple.
Couple of corrections.East;
In my humble perception, Date of Hire was removed from ALPA merger policy 16 YEARS AGO. In fact I believe it was at the hand of US Air representation. Speaking of what if's....what if we merged with yet another MORE senior pilot group?? Would you sing DOH then? I think not (is there ANYONE more senior by DOH than the FORMER AAA pilots?).
Guess what? DOH is NOT the basic concept of the ALPA merger policy. Further, the recent legislation now helps a relative seniority argument as a result of the AA/TWA merger. USAPA was born from a van full of pilots that were upset because DOH was not delivered as promised (Guess what further?.....Not ALPA National's fault!).
ALPA (while not perfect) is the best representation and provider of benefits for this group. ALPA is the means to the quickest contract improvements. Step up and help us get money for all of us.
PS...What does "Seniority is like a crew meal" mean????
Did I say that?...did you read that anywhere in my several posts? Of course not..and you infer that I'm cheering for USAPA..show me where I've done that also...Let me guess . . . the furlough was ALPA's fault . . . and no USAPA-represented pilot will ever be furloughed, right?
Actually Elixir, you did say just that, I know you didn't mean it that way, but you did blame alpa for your furlough, go back and read your post.Did I say that?...did you read that anywhere in my several posts? Of course not..and you infer that I'm cheering for USAPA..show me where I've done that also...
Stop putting your words in other's mouth's.
The manner in which the 2000 guys were "handled" offended us all.
Actually Elixir, you did say just that, I know you didn't mean it that way, ......