High Speed Steel
Veteran
- Feb 14, 2004
- 1,375
- 136
Odie, "Shut your pie hole, and go sit in the truck!"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Odie, "Shut your pie hole, and go sit in the truck!"
Good night eggo boy!I'm done for the evening. You children go ahead and play.
Hello again TWu Informer (Reformer?), it's time again for as the Waffle Boy turns. I've been busy for the past few days, as I have a life that doesn't leave me hours upon hours to spend here as some such as yourself on this BB whining about what the TWu 514/International doesn't do, or why if I was a 514 member I won't do anything about it but cry. Such as you continuously do here. Maybe borrow a TWu Strike Snake shirt from Speedy and "hissssss" your way to TWu stardom.Hackman, think about your facts.
It was Wes Nightingale the was accosted by the Crew Chief in the Seat Shop, not me. Cannot remember that Crew Chiefs name but I think he was nick named "The Strangler". But your age is causing memory fault...that wasn't me.
But you are right about one thing, helping "strong union men" like yourself get cards out of Tulsa is NOT on my agenda.
Give us a specific example of when I folded during the AMFA drive. Because I have a much different memory of those times.
I would love to hear your specifics.
Have you ever considered taking a few more steroids and beating signatures on cards out of pussies to get your way?
You may as well, your skills as an orgainzer turn 100 away for every 1 you get. Maybe you can give us a lesson in the strategy of attacking and brow beatiing every potential supporter that comes your way? Because you stick with your already signed allies like glue, and then alienate those you need to get signed on a regular basis. We had a few organizers like you during the AMFA Drive. One of the ignorant fools solely responsible for dropping by the Machinist area and proclaiming how each of them were screwed when AMFA came to the property. I never understood this as a legitimate attempt to succeed. You seem to have the same skills. Can you help me understand how that is working for ya?
It's times like these I wish I was back out on the line, Good luck and Stay the Course.Point of order guys.
Negotiations resume this week. This is the first time the two committees will meet with the company and the mediator for negotiations since the membership rejected the TA back in August.
None of the other workgroups have had any success in getting the company to budge off demanding more concessions either. The company, is claiming they want "cost neutral", they expect labor costs to stay the same and let inflation and raising medical premiums cut our pay even more. They are making these demands despite soaring revenue and declining headcount.
To date the company has ignored all the unions, TWU, APFA and APA and taken the position that we are all satisfied with what we are getting, they even boast about things like the 99% on time performance over Thanksgiving. It has long been managaements position that as long as their planes are going out on time that the workers are content and the company doesnt have to do anything the Unions ask of them.
I think the companys assumptions are wrong. They say they dont understand why we turned down the TA, we've been telling them for three years but they refuse to listen to us, the APFA or the APA. We sent them a clear message by rejecting the TA.
By the end of the week it will be clear to everyone whether or not the company got the message.
If they didnt get the message through us or through a rejected TA we have to try another way, a way that gets them to listen.
Next week is Christmas.
Another year of concessions coming to an end.
I too wish you good luck with the stalemate of negotiations Bob.....with this company you'll need all the luck you can find.Point of order guys.
Negotiations resume this week. This is the first time the two committees will meet with the company and the mediator for negotiations since the membership rejected the TA back in August.
None of the other workgroups have had any success in getting the company to budge off demanding more concessions either. The company, is claiming they want "cost neutral", they expect labor costs to stay the same and let inflation and raising medical premiums cut our pay even more. They are making these demands despite soaring revenue and declining headcount.
To date the company has ignored all the unions, TWU, APFA and APA and taken the position that we are all satisfied with what we are getting, they even boast about things like the 99% on time performance over Thanksgiving. It has long been managaements position that as long as their planes are going out on time that the workers are content and the company doesnt have to do anything the Unions ask of them.
I think the companys assumptions are wrong. They say they dont understand why we turned down the TA, we've been telling them for three years but they refuse to listen to us, the APFA or the APA. We sent them a clear message by rejecting the TA.
By the end of the week it will be clear to everyone whether or not the company got the message.
If they didnt get the message through us or through a rejected TA we have to try another way, a way that gets them to listen.
Next week is Christmas.
Another year of concessions coming to an end.
On Jan 9 2005 This is what our economist saidECLAT/Oliver Wyman has probably represented one side or the other in about half the labor negotiations done in the past ten years, with SH&E being involved in probably most of the rest.
At the end of the day there are less than a half dozen firms who understand airline economics enough to do labor relations consulting.
So bash these guys all you want for for making a living advising unions and companies on what is/isn't fair, but I doubt they're playing both sides of the fence on any given engagement. If they did, they'd never get hired again in the future, and they'd probably forfeit business from either side in future negotiations.
My company will regularly have two teams working on opposite sides of a given situation (e.g. one group advising travel agents how to get more money from airlines, and another group advising airlines how to stop paying travel agents). As long as there's a Chinese Wall between the respective teams and they're not conspiring or sharing confidential information, there's no harm, & no foul. The moment we breach those confidentiality agreements, we're liable for damages from both sides. It's no different with BCG, Bain, Accenture, Wyman, or SH&E.