TWU informer
Veteran
- Nov 4, 2003
- 7,550
- 3,731
One could also say that the company was simply returning the favor from giving you guys a good contract in 2001.
Seriously, what did you "give up" in 2001 or the previous contract?
I remember people claiming 2001 was a great contract, thanks to the "threat" of AMFA.
The 1997 contract (?) would have been when AMR was making record profits. What did you "give up" then, other than allowing the SRP/OSM classifications?
We've all heard about how far you fell in 2003, but I don't recall a whole lot of discussion on how far the 2003 cuts compared to where you were in 2000 or 1996.
E,
There was NO 1997 Contract. There was a 1995 Contract that was 6 years in length offered a total of 6.5% in pay raises over the life of the 6 years. that was the beginning of the SRP/OSM classification which you seem to dismiss and not really giving up. This allowed 25% of the Overhaul Bases to become unskilled cheap labor. This equated to many high seniority older employees to be moved out into the hangar. in my opinion this cost the union and the company even more. The number of Workers Comp Claims rose and now continues to rise at staggering rates due to old workers crawling around in cargo spaces, on the floor of cabin and cockpits. Not to mention many of those unskilled SRP's were relatives promoted to management, and that I believe you and I both agree is lacking horribly in ability. In my opinion, A "give back" is not always measured in pay and benefits.
Most of us made more money in the late 90's due to overtime. Since 2000, my reportable gross income has never topped what I made in the late 90's. Some of that pay was from IdeAAs in Action submitted to save money, some was from overtime, some was from base/skill pay. Not only did they strip the payrates of 17.5% because the union wanted to keep every swinging slong on the payroll, overtime was cutoff for over 7 years also. And IdeAAs payment was eliminated.
When I get my Social Security Statement from the Fed's the real picture comes clear to me that we have gone backwards just in simple math of pay. Add to that 10 year of inflation and other losses mentioned and you have a terrible mix of loss of buying power in the economy.
I am no longer a big chest pounder about saving the profession, I just want to save my own retirement and lifestyle. But please don't express false views that we have not given up more than can be calcuated on the surface. Problem is, with the mangement we have now, I think we could for $10 per hour No benefits, and we would still fail as far as overhaul maintenance goes. So on one hand I want to fight, on the other hand it appears best to salvage what I can before its over anyway.