Vortilon said:
Back in 95, most of us were in our mid 30s. Early retirement wasn't a real big concern for most of us at the time. The TWU international used a 2 or 3 year old survey they took, as an excuse for the terrible structure of the contract. By that time in 95, the industry was starting to turn the corner on profits, yet the TWU international was quoting the 3 year old survey, and the concerns of the then dated survey as presently relevant. Let's not forget that the vote count back then was cause for concern as well. That contract only passed by the slimest of margins as well. The amount of ballots that were thrown out in Dallas alone was over 100. A no vote, was considered a yes vote. Remember, it's not really how many ballots that are turned in - it's who is counting the ballots. The International and Ed Kosiatek were gonna do what they could - to get their retirement age buddies a 5 and 5 retirement deal at all costs. The building cleaners got turned into SRPs, and the rest of us got hosed into a 6 year contract with a 1% raise each year. All this, while the industry was making record profits. Thanks again TWU.
1. The survey was sent out approximately 12 months prior to negotiations. The AA Presidents Council reviewed it in addition to the proposals received from their respective memberships. The Presidents Council subsequently voted on the proposals to be submitted to the company.
Neither an International Officer nor the AA System Coordinator voted on the proposals.
2. The Contract Ratification Ballots were mailed back to each Local to be verified and tabulated. The Local Presidents were required to submit a letter to the AA System Coordinator verifying the results. There were no disputes from any Local as to the veracity of the vote. A No vote was a No vote, not a Yes vote.
3. Since no SRP could be hired until the Tulsa AMT recall list was exhausted, the Early Retirement (5 and 5 issue) was American’s proposal, which would allow them to recall the more than 1,000 AMT’s then on layoff. All classification were eligible for the Early Out.
4. At that time, the top wages of Major Airline AMT’s were from $2.50 (UAL) to $7.00 (TWA) below American rates.
The 6 year Contract was not a 1% raise per year:
Percentage Base Pay increases
3.5% base pay increase 36 months after signing
3% base pay increase 54 months after signing
Side Letter: AMT pay scale percentage increase to equivalent Pilot Pay increase
Increased License Premium
$2.25 (2 lic)
Annual /Pensionable Profit Sharing Plan
3/15/96 – 2% minimum lump sum
3/15/97 – 2% minimum lump sum
3/15/98 – 2% minimum lump sum
Immediately following the brief APA Strike in 1997, a PEB No. 233 was convened
and after their review recommended the following.
APA Base Scale increases
8/31/97 – 3%
8/31/98 – 2%
8/31/99 – 1.5%
(AA Pilots negotiated the same 6 year (4 year wage freeze) package as TWU. Pilots subsequently extended their contract by 1 year for an additional 2% wage increase in the 7th year. This was offered to TWU but the International advised against it since the economy might change (as it did) leading up to the 2001 negotiations)