This thread is a complete joke. If AA Management asked the NMB to grant the TWU request for a cooling off period and then the same TA was voted again, the TWU would fold up like a cheap tent and the big puffer fish that voted NO would crap their pants. I bet Jim Little would sign this same agreement without further ratification before any strike would actually happen. Just look at the fear generated by AMP Organizers threatening the TWU dues base. You honestly think Jim Little would risk it all over this TA? Most NO voters I talk with are not one bit interested in a Strike and if the 30 clock was running, they would cave and run for the hills. As soon as this company calls the union bluff, the ashes will fall like another Mt St Helen eruption.
The fact is the Line AMT is being offered below market rates for their duties.
And the Overhaul AMT is being offered above market rates for theri duties.
The problem is how do you address this and be true to union seniority.
Nobody in the Union has the balls to speak about this fact, and apparently nobody in the union has a solution to this problem. But until somebody open and honestly speaks to the problem, then we are all just acting on emotion instead of truthful facts.
But once a 30 day cooling off period begins and the threat of strike happens, those overhaul mechanics will change their tune and their votes real quick. The line guys might still take a stand. But I honestly don't see how the overhaul mechanic would fair much better in a PEB, Binding Arbitration, or a strike. If the cost of doing their in-house overhaul exceeds the value of control then AA would just get out of the overhaul business and move on. Then seniority rules and many line mechanics will lose out. What a delima we are faced with here, and everyone seems to ignore the truth and babble their emotions like water flowing down the Mississippi River.
Many of you are not going to like this post. But those are the facts as I see them. And as always, I do have the balls to say what's on my mind.