Such a man of God you are, insulting, name calling, attacking and lying.
Get your $2,500 yet this month?
Profit sharing wasnt raised?
Why are you lying again?
It was cut from 15% to 10% that is a 33% reduction, the payout was more because DL's profits increased.
So why dont you tell the board how much they would really earned if it wasnt cut by 1/3?
Spin away spin master.
everyone here just wonders why you are so committed to unionization at DL if you supposedly have nothing to gain.
As much as you or anyone else want to argue otherwise, I absolutely have a financial interest in DL's success.
Thus, the question of what you stand to gain by selling your message - which is consistently riddled with half truths is very much a fair question to ask.
I, once again, am willing to leave the discussion regarding representation issues - but only if you and every other non-DL employee does also.
But you can't stand quietly on the sidelines because you have an irrepressible urge to inject yourself in a discussion that should be left to active DL employees.
As for profit sharing, no one has argued that DL reduced the percentage accumulation for profit sharing - but they increased the total profit sharing by 25% and, for the first time ever, DL profit sharing was paid at the highest rate permissible in the plan for profits above $2 BILLION.
Further, you can't accept that DL pilots voted for the same reduction in profit sharing percentage but ALSO got higher total profit sharing.
You are hellbent on comparing pilots to non-contract employees; why aren't you asking why the pilots aren't in an uproar even though you admit that DL employees have no voice.
SO, DL lowered the percentage, the pilots voted for it, all DL employees accrued profit sharing at the same percentage, and since the non-contract emplloyees have no voice and are just being jerked around by mgmt., profit sharing was just a gift from mgmt to keep the unions out anyway.
that would be an accurate assessment of your logic, 700.
and DL employees aren't buying it... they have rejected unions at least a dozen times before and will do it again.
Why don't you worry about all the members the IAM will lose at UA because the IAM supported a contract that will result in the loss of thousands of jobs?
Why don't you fix the salary gap at US which Parker is once again doing nothing to fix?
Provide service to the people who paid for representation instead of trying to sell to people who want it based on half-truths at best.