737823 said:
And the IAM negotiated (you claim NWA imposed) AMFA scope on the IAM and the IAM and their members had no choice but to perform the work, or else it would be insubordination.
No, 700's right; most of that already existed in our CBA. Same with cleaning (interior & exterior both), and some light-and specific- GSE maintenance work.
AMFA obviously had their own language, and in cities where there were staffed, they performed the work. Where it gets interesting is when some places had one AMFA group, but not another. For example, my station at the time had AMT's, but had never had cleaners. Our GSE (Plant Maintenance) guy had been furloughed earlier when the company closed our point to both. The AMT's were eventually recalled, but he went on to enjoy a great career at a local GM dealership. Too bad, too; guy was a freakin' genius.
At any rate, much of the shared language was stripped out of the Agreement imposed on AMFA in 12/05. The only "new" language that appeared in ours came during the 1113 process, and involved taxiing planes. AFAIK, not a single ESE ever performed that work. Honestly, I'm not even sure why they included it.
That's all well and good, but it's also 8 years behind us in the rearview mirror, and the movement to secure representation today doesn't look a bit like what many might remember 143 to have been.
The activists I know are all looking forward, and looking to build something entirely different to suit an entirely different dynamic.