Did the majority of FA's decide not to have a union vote or did I decide the FA's could not have a vote.
Twist the words any way you want to fit your narrative, the majority of FA's have had spoken.......again!
Yes you are correct. The majority of FA's at that moment 3 and a half years ago spoke and said they were not interested in representation. That vote was actually an excellent participation rate of 92% voting.
The results were 9,544 votes against the union, and 9,216 in favor of the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) or other unions. The margin was 328 votes, or 1.7 percent.
Now I personally do not consider a 51% no or yes vote to be a mandate in either direction. Either side could easily have a rethink of their decision at that time and the scales could be tipped? Had that decision been closer to 80% voting no I may be questioning why any union is even bothering? But that's not the case here obviously.
Another thing is that this is now the IAM picking up the baton from the AFA. The IAM is a lot larger and has far more resources to fight against the anti union campaign that DL will absolutely engage in than the AFA did.
I think the outcome next go around will have a very different ultimate decision?
And I have ZERO problems with anyone voicing their opinion of the negatives of union representation and believe potential voters should be aware of those negatives, unlike yourself and other drum beaters here!
So provide your list of negatives then. But please refrain from using talking points that I have already answered further back in the thread. We have no need for redundancies.
No one I know of at DL is ashamed of anything! And as you, are a product of "Your" environment!
Last time I checked, no one was being forced, against their will, to stay at "The Widget"!