New Contracts have Big Problems
I have reviewed the new contract and I have found numorous discrepencies. Unfortunately, none of the discrepencies favor the members, only the company.
For starters, can anyone show me where your contract did away with the 60 day rule for those who may be getting laid off?
The health deductible from Attachment A used to read:
single: $450
family: $900
Now it reads: $900, where did the $450 for single go?
Some places of your contract, the company attorneys change the word 'will' to the more kindler and gentler 'may'.
Please let me know where there is any mention of PVD and BDL as class 1 stations.
And many many more problems.
At any rate, they also removed the word 'pocketsize'. Your contracts are suppose to be pocketsize so your stewards can carry them around. They are also suppose to be bound, not wired in a flimsy way. It's in the agreement and it's non-negotiable. It's called disrespect.
You want to hear something even scarier? Reviewing the 1999 contract with the 2005 one I found more discrepencies and I haven't a clue where the language came from and why some things are ommitted.
The good thing is that you voted in new officers who care about these things and are working to resolve them. The old regime didn't even raise an eyebrow to these problems.
regards,
Tim Nelson
IAM Local Chairman, 1487, Chicago