Pinocchio
View attachment 3972
700UW Posted Today, 01:51 PM
When are you going to post facts and be able to debate?
Like I said, there is precedent setting rulings from the NMB on these types of cases.
You are too ignorant to even educate yourself, keep posting your insults since that is all the intelligence is capable of doing.
Don't let the facts get in your way
700UW Posted Today, 12:29 PM
Like I said, you ibters cant debate, is that the past mafia control of the ibt coming out?
You all will be in for a rude awakening if you don't educate yoruself.
By the way there was Lake Central, Mohawk, PSA and Piedmont.
Go learn your history.
700UW Posted Today, 12:20 PM
Is that the best you can do?
By the way that is a 737-400 that was in the CLT Hangar undergoing heavy mtc, something you dont do out west.
And 700UW is an Airbus A319, not a B737-400.
Guess you must be coming out of the closet if all you can do is post a pic of man's ass.
And once again, go educate yourself, and take off the rose colored glasses.
Maybe you will actually learn something and will be able to debate instead of always ignoring the issues at hand, is that how the ibt operates?
The status quo does not apply, go look at any merger when a single carrier status motion is granted.
Go ask the former PSA ibt Mechanic and Related what happened when US Air merger.
Hint the ibt contract went bye bye.
Don't let the facts get in your way.
You ibters better go get educated, you make this way too easy.
See all your rants and not one link to any facts.
Lets see if you can debate IAM contract article 17 pgh P
or maybe NMB 9.204, 9.207, 9.208, 9.210????
Do you need there links???
http://www.nmb.gov/index.html
http://www.teamsterslocal104.org/usair_iam...ement_intro.htm
To start this debate +or-172 pages of your contract has been changed by art17 pgh P so what facts do you have that more changes are not on there way???
View attachment 3973