Tim Nelson
Veteran
I think the IAM had to do what it had to do at Eastern and I was proud of Charlie Bryan and Wimp for stopping Lorenzo in its tracks.AMFAinMIAMI said:
Tim
The IAM cost lots of jobs at Eastern then right we went on strike in 1989.
The IAM cost the cont. guys their pension and jobs
the IAM cost how much at United
The IAM cost the TWA guys jobs and pension as well.
As I said email or call the AMFA national officers ask them about why and what happened at NWA don't just believe the IAM/TWU/IBT bs.
The IAM crossed a picket line set up by the AMFA. So did the Pilots & FA.
They did not have a plan when they went on strike but neither did the IAM when I walked with Eastern. I lost my job and my pension went to the PBGC.
I also lost $20K in stock because the IAM said they could not take it off the stock exchange.
What has the IAM done for you?
Do you want the TWU/IAM to run it here? That is the question and if not AMFA then tell me which since you guys voted not to have the IBT?
Every Union is going to blame the other guy for its failure, but with AMFA we can get rid of the leaders when we want. "YES" there is a process I know but the IAM/IBT/TWU the top guys are put in at convention or someother way, you and I will not have a vote in that but with AMFA you will.
Last yr AMFA replace its area dir and asst nat dir. the members had a vote. Did you ever get that with the IAM?
Like I said ask the AMFA don't believe what you hear from the IAM. Or ask a guys who were actually there. 700uw was NOT. He's not even a AMT. Just a strong IAM supporter.
That is his right, to do and I commend his vigor for them but ask your self what has the IAM done for me since I have been here at USAirways? What have I lost? Why did we sign IBT cards to rid US of them?
This assoc/alliance is wrong for our class and craft, my opinion along with many here at AA.
Just look at what just happened with the pass ridding, its being done the AA way. First come first serve. That is the way it was at Eastern as well yrs ago. Delta and US do it by seniority.
There is going to be lots of changes when it is all said and done some good some bad.
Its up to you guys at US to decide which Union we have most here don't want this Assoc./alliance.
That said, the IAM has been absolutely terrible for the working class. The United contract is perhaps the worst contract ever signed in the history of the airline labor movement. The IAM completely botched the boeing members. When the NLRB blocked the South Carolina plant, the IAM INTL worked closely with Boeing management and turned its back on the NLRB by siding with management on a new contract that didn't prevent the outsourcing. The agreement allowed Boeing to keep scabbing the jobs in South Carolina, in return, management agreed not to oppose organizing efforts. BTW, those organizing efforts have failed, and now because of the stupid strategy, the Washington Boeing members are facing a new roadblock. It's a true shame that the IAM INTL refused to allow the District and Local members turn down a TA without making them all look like jackarses and having a revote tomorrow.
700 can tell you, at US AIRWAYS, after a vote, the IAM said the US AIRWAYS MX were 'confused'. So, don't get me wrong when I question AMFA. It doesn't mean that I think the IAM is good. The IAM is the "Ill Ask Management" union and is outright horrific enough to make any Labor guy roll over in a grave. But the onus is upon you to prove how AMFA is different. AMFA appears mostly "Cult-like" to me, plus I don't like the BS coming from their camp about the McCaskill-Bond. Maybe if all of these unions were flat out honest, then one of them would move forward. As someone who knows the MBA quite well and got attorneys fired over it, I can assure you that if the Association were not in place that the US AIRWAYS MX and Fleet wouldn't have the seniority security that AMFA has said is available.