snapthis
Veteran
- Dec 23, 2009
- 4,236
- 6,907
just bringing this up to this page...
Be careful, really careful when dealing when with Usapians. They lie and cheat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
just bringing this up to this page...
Be careful, really careful when dealing when with Usapians. They lie and cheat.
Still wanting to cut in line for the east jobs I see. Ho hum...This statement needs to be clear-ified.
Lets see just how zealous you are.
You say you liked the sound of some list the east had. So you have seen it and can answer some questions.
Was the mythical list before or after the Nicolau was released?
What "ALPA" lawyers are you talking about? I don't believe Dan Katts is an ALPA lawyer.
What slotting method did it use? LOS?
How were the "ALPA" lawyers amazed. Freund was amazed at the DOH list the east presented. That is not to say he agreed or thought it was in any way fair or workable.
Lastly define "some" furloughed going ahead of active west pilots. Exactly how many furlough pilots do you think was reasonable to go ahead of west active pilots? Give me a number.
The east had 1700 furloughed pilots. If half 800 furloughed pilot were placed ahead of west active pilots that means that 50% of the west pilots would have had a furloughed east pilot senior to them. Is that reasonable and fair or zealous? Would 50 furloughed east pilots made everything ok for you?
The west had a line in the sand. So what the east had your line in the sand. An arbitrator decided. He just decided that your line was erasable, furloughed pilots senior to active pilots was not.
So tell us what you thought was reasonable that you saw the east present.
Before or after the ruling?
If there really was just one line and if you east guys could have gotten us to stand in your line you might have been correct.Still wanting to cut in line for the east jobs I see. Ho hum...
That discomfort is understandable. Very few, even supposed adults could conversationally accept such "big words" as "Cryhole".
Especially the west ones that pretend they are from the east.Be careful, really careful when dealing when with Usapians. They lie and cheat.
I don't belong to the AFO club. That's an exclusive club located on Woodlawn which will be for lease very soon. I only associate with real union pilots.
Do some research and you can find the answers!If there really was just one line and if you east guys could have gotten us to stand in your line you might have been correct.
But the two lines MERGED.
You also totally ignored my questions.
Especially the west ones that pretend they are from the east.
This statement needs to be clear-ified.
Lets see just how zealous you are.
You say you liked the sound of some list the east had. So you have seen it and can answer some questions.
Was the mythical list before or after the Nicolau was released?
What "ALPA" lawyers are you talking about? I don't believe Dan Katts is an ALPA lawyer.
What slotting method did it use? LOS?
How were the "ALPA" lawyers amazed. Freund was amazed at the DOH list the east presented. That is not to say he agreed or thought it was in any way fair or workable.
Lastly define "some" furloughed going ahead of active west pilots. Exactly how many furlough pilots do you think was reasonable to go ahead of west active pilots? Give me a number.
The east had 1700 furloughed pilots. If half 800 furloughed pilot were placed ahead of west active pilots that means that 50% of the west pilots would have had a furloughed east pilot senior to them. Is that reasonable and fair or zealous? Would 50 furloughed east pilots made everything ok for you?
The west had a line in the sand. So what the east had your line in the sand. An arbitrator decided. He just decided that your line was erasable, furloughed pilots senior to active pilots was not.
So tell us what you thought was reasonable that you saw the east present.
Before or after the ruling?
just bringing this up to this page...
Wow. can't even agree on a definition of terminology?
![]()
![]()
![]()