If it is so simple and clear that the MOU kills the Nicolau. Why not clear state that? Why would usapa leave any doubt or room for interpretation? This has been going on for 5 because both sides read the language differently.
The east has the majority and have always said majority rules and you get to vote on seniority. You east pilots also say the company plays games with language. Why not plainly state up front and leave no doubt?
Why did usapa hide in your belief the MOU killed the Nicolau? Why did they state that the MOU was neutral and did not kill the MOU or implement DOH? Do you think it would have passed if the MOU plainly stated DOH would be used in the American merger for the us airways list?
Cut the BS. It's clear and you have paid your attorney's plenty if you couldn't figure it out.
You voted for it because YOU thought the language could be played to your favor. We'll see.