Feb / Mar 2013 US Pilots Labor Discussion

[Walmartgreeter]

Nothing in the MOU trumps federal law and the status quo provisions. Nothing. I know you think this agreement waves a magic wand relieving the West of their civil rights but you would be incorrect. You indeed are under a contingent CBA that is joint to the East and West. The MOU was designed to me "neutral" on the seniority issue while at the same time removing all ripeness barriers so this could move smoothly through the court system unimpeded by technicalities.

[font=Arial']Wait. Stop the presses! A new phrase from Marty..."contingent CBA!" Somebody call Parker and Kirby and tell them to forget the JCBA talks with APA and USAPA. It's done. Go home.[/font]

[font=Arial']Your "civil rights?" Really? [/font]

[font=Arial']Greeter[/font]

 

[nic4us]

You have been predicting damages for years and have been wrong every, single, time. What's different this time? Even if you are correct that the case is ripe, what's the damage?

Read the NY case.

They sued the wrong people. Where have we seen that before?

 

[nic4us]

[font=Arial'][font=Arial']Anytime I have ever been told to expect a "big surprise," good or bad, it has never panned out.[/font][/font]

[font=Arial'][font=Arial']If you really had something in the bag, telling us would be the last thing competent legal help would advise. And there is the rub.[/font][/font]

[font=Arial'][font=Arial']Greeter[/font][/font]

I am not an AOL officer or member or whatever they call themselves.

Nor do I have any inside info from the lawyers retained by AOL for the West pilot class.

But, I can figure where this is going. Usapa once again tries to use the federal court system to attack West financing. Just like in the RICO when the scabs went after AWAPPA.

Marty already told you in his letters where it is going, and it is not a federal court.

 

[Pi brat]

Read the NY case.

They sued the wrong people. Where have we seen that before?

No genius, you have all the answers so I asked you. What are the damages to the west and how will you recover. You have the stage, let's shine.

 

[nic4us]

[font=Arial']Wait. Stop the presses! A new phrase from Marty..."contingent CBA!" Somebody call Parker and Kirby and tell them to forget the JCBA talks with APA and USAPA. It's done. Go home.[/font]

[font=Arial']Your "civil rights?" Really? [/font]

[font=Arial']Greeter[/font]

Another thing.

The West did not put the 17 year guy behind a new hire.

But, that is where they will stay. Guess whose fault that is.....USAPA's.

 

[Walmartgreeter]

Another thing.

The West did not put the 17 year guy behind a new hire.

True. It indeed did not happen.

Greeter

 

[Pi brat]

True. It indeed did not happen.

Greeter

See, most on here are not great guys.........;-)

 

[Metroyet]

[font=Arial']Wait. Stop the presses! A new phrase from Marty..."contingent CBA!" Somebody call Parker and Kirby and tell them to forget the JCBA talks with APA and USAPA. It's done. Go home.[/font]

[font=Arial']Your "civil rights?" Really? [/font]

[font=Arial']Greeter[/font]

Yes. Civil rights. And yes a contingent CBA. Why don't you look at the title of the document you AGREED to. Amazing how no light bulbs went off out East...look it up and read it. Sleep well.

 

[Walmartgreeter]

But, I can figure where this is going. Usapa once again tries to use the federal court system to attack West financing.

Seems to me the NIC was a pretty big attack on "East finanacing," as well as Addington I and the West dues boycott.

Greeter

 

[nic4us]

Seems to me the NIC was a pretty big attack on "East finanacing," as well as Addington I and the West dues boycott.

Greeter

That make no sense.

How did the Nic attack east financing? You got more seniority than you deserved, and could have had a raise, that would have been bigger than you deserved, even if it only brought you parity to the West.


The only thing that attacked east financing was the usapa founders who intentionally wished for delay and permanent separate ops.

Wait just a second, are you that dual unionist rep from PHL that got removed by ALPA national for using union resources to try and oust the union?

That would explain a lot, and why you have twice now made posts asking the West to drag this thing out in court and continue the usapa game plan of delay and separate ops.




That would explain a lot, and why you have twice posted

 

[Bill Brasky]

Yes. Civil rights. And yes a contingent CBA. Why don't you look at the title of the document you AGREED to. Amazing how no light bulbs went off out East...look it up and read it. Sleep well.

You are an idiot.

 

[Phoenix]

I would wish you luck in that NY bankruptcy complaint, but I am not patronizing a-hole.

So, instead I will say that when judge Lane kicks uscaba out of the room, there is a huge surprise coming uscaba's way.

Say goodbye to the scab treasury, and get ready for assessments. Does that not bother you because you are on disability and not subject to union assessment?

If I am on disability you are a god... Omniscience and integrity.

 

[Walmartgreeter]

That would explain a lot, and why you have twice now made posts asking the West to drag this thing out in court and continue the usapa game plan of delay and separate ops.

That would explain a lot, and why you have twice posted

With tongue firmly planted in cheek, I have advocated the continuation of West litigation and the continued East separate ops. Don't you get it, the more you fight, the better it gets for me?

Greeter

 

[Walmartgreeter]

That make no sense.

Wait just a second, are you that dual unionist rep from PHL that got removed by ALPA national for using union resources to try and oust the union?

Busted. That is me. Guilty as charged.

Please don't tell Koontz, he asked me not to post here.

Are we ok? Really? I take it all back.

Greeter

 

[nic4us]

No genius, you have all the answers so I asked you. What are the damages to the west and how will you recover. You have the stage, let's shine.

PM