Phoenix
Veteran
- Apr 16, 2003
- 8,584
- 7,430
I was at the meeting, LS is spot on. You are either a liar or a propagandist.
Well, rest easy, at least no one EVER suspected that of you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was at the meeting, LS is spot on. You are either a liar or a propagandist.
Any way you figure it,,,,,,,,,,, I'm right where I want to be and not going anywhere.
With the blatant warning regarding the requirement of an LUP which we all know you don't have. Relax, the ball is in play again and you're under a joint CBA. You should welcome the news.Your beloved ALPA is gone from this property forever. Get over it. USAPA can submit whatever they deem appropriate. The Ninth AND judge Silver said so.
[font=Arial'][font=Arial']I am sure you and others have a lot of ideas about how things should have happened, but there was a concerted illegal effort to destroy USAPA. It took two atom bombs to stop the nonsense. RICO and the NMB. Nothing else worked, and it still took a year to get their dues. How do you think the NY operation was paid for during the Hudson landing? It sure as heck was not from great intentions or good will.[/font][/font]
[font=Arial'][font=Arial']You were not at the meeting in PHX, and I find your junior detective work (how much Seham talks) to be meaningless here.[/font][/font]
[font=Arial'][font=Arial']Larry probably is a great guy, as I am sure 99.9% of the folks on this forum are. But his accounting of what went down at the meeting is revisionist history. [/font][/font]
[font=Arial'][font=Arial']If people insist on keeping this thread going , bring it on.[/font][/font]
[font=Arial'][font=Arial']Greeter[/font][/font]
Both the 9th and judge Silver were referencing negotiating with the company, LCC.
Now we are talking about negotiating with another union and another company.
DFRII is ripe because we have a ratified document in which the scab union failed it's DFR.
Bring it up with the 9th, and I am sure you will, they already warned uscaba about the pain of a DFR.
Let's make it simpler. List the things you do like, besides post without emoticons.
I was at the meeting, LS is spot on. You are either a liar or a propagandist.
I like emoticons but after you and EastUS1 post there's never any left.
With the blatant warning regarding the requirement of an LUP which we all know you don't have. Relax, the ball is in play again and you're under a joint CBA. You should welcome the news.
Like I said before...24 defendants all say they told Seeham and the scabs to go to he!!, and one founder of a scab union saying the opposite.
Good luck!!!
I was at the meeting, LS is spot on. You are either a liar or a propagandist.
Say goodbye to the scab treasury, and get ready for assessments. Does that not bother you because you are on disability and not subject to union assessment?
Nothing in the MOU trumps federal law and the status quo provisions. Nothing. I know you think this agreement waves a magic wand relieving the West of their civil rights but you would be incorrect. You indeed are under a contingent CBA that is joint to the East and West. The MOU was designed to me "neutral" on the seniority issue while at the same time removing all ripeness barriers so this could move smoothly through the court system unimpeded by technicalities.There is no JCBA. Nothing at all has changed and won't unless and until there is a POR, at which time everything is replaced with the new agreement, that we all agreed to. Good luck with that being a DFR breach. Really, good luck. The longer you guys tie it up the longer it is DOH!
I would wish you luck in that NY bankruptcy complaint, but I am not patronizing a-hole.
So, instead I will say that when judge Lane kicks uscaba out of the room, there is a huge surprise coming uscaba's way.
Say goodbye to the scab treasury, and get ready for assessments. Does that not bother you because you are on disability and not subject to union assessment?