Yea like B-scale, prefunding, SRPs, etc.Despite what everyone has said, I think the informal, non-traditional approach is a good and proactive step for TWU and American -- it will set a standard for others to follow.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yea like B-scale, prefunding, SRPs, etc.Despite what everyone has said, I think the informal, non-traditional approach is a good and proactive step for TWU and American -- it will set a standard for others to follow.
Despite what everyone has said, I think the informal, non-traditional approach is a good and proactive step for TWU and American -- it will set a standard for others to follow.
That's right they only have enough to pay back 2 of the unions, so the twu stepped up and volunteered to have their membership screwed with this extension.you people are really smoking crack if you think we are getting everything we lost back. If you think they will spend every penny of the recenct profits to pay all 3 unions back you are dead wrong. So a 2 year extension might be a good idea to allow them to get a little stronger finacial picture
you people are really smoking crack if you think we are getting everything we lost back. If you think they will spend every penny of the recenct profits to pay all 3 unions back you are dead wrong. So a 2 year extension might be a good idea to allow them to get a little stronger finacial picture
It's probably Don Videtich. I was told that he actually told a union brother, in front of company officials, that he must be on crack when the brother said he wanted everything back.Can't afford crack even if I wanted too. Concessions saw to that.
Again, why can't we get back what we want? The company got what they wanted it when they "needed" it so we should be able to do the same now.
Sure, let's give a two year extension to the company "to allow them to get a little stronger financial picture". Then when that two years is up we can give them another two years, and so on because the company and union will always come up with an excuse why it is needed.
By your alias and member profile I can see that you are either in a union office or management office typing what your master tells you. h34r:
It's probably Don Videtich. I was told that he actually told a union brother, in front of company officials, that he must be on crack when the brother said he wanted everything back.
The fact is "everything back and then some" is more than reasonable, the company can afford it. Sure people like FWAA would love to see our expectations lowered because it means more profits for the shareholders.
Its not unreasonable for us to expect everything back that we gave up to prevent BK. We had all this stuff before so there is no reason why we shouldnt expect it again, we still make the same sacrifices. If the company claims they cant afford it they are lying, the fact is we have around 30% fewer employees with around the same revenue.
The company claimed they needed to reduce labor costs by 25%, Well they did that initially by cutting our compensation by 25%, then they went and eliminated another 30% of the workforce, thus lowering costs well beyond the 25% that was needed at that time of crisis. Well the crisis is over, if they give us everything back their costs are still 30%, well beyond the 25% they claimed they needed, than they used to be because there is 30% less employees..
Most of these Presidents are eyeing up International spots as an escape. They have no intentions on fighting for"their members". When the deal goes down and the members are outraged all they will do is point fingers at everyone else.This is a repeat of history with the TWU! The Presidents council is a scapegoat for the International perioid! In my opinion, This whole deal has been worked out and they will use the presidents Council to buy into it and get it to the membership for a vote and then blame the Presidents and the members. I can't beleive after all these years of smoke and mirrors newly elected presidents do not see it or want to try to change it for the benefit of their members. Even if they tried and failed it would better than leading us to the slaughter again. For the Presidents who have been here before shame on the members for re-electing the sheep.
<_< ------- Has anyone heard anything else at all about this so called proposal? Or has this hand picked committee sequestered itself indefinitely? :huh:
Sounds to me like the TWU has already accepted the proposal. Why would you expect anything different from them?I heard that the company wanted a three year extension and Jim Little said the membership would not go for three they might go for two. I predict that the union will try to present the union's idea on non-traditional compensation with perhaps an 18 month extension.
I am disgusted that the twu would assist the company in not giving us back what was taken. Amazed, no. Disgusted, yes.
I heard that the company wanted a three year extension and Jim Little said the membership would not go for three they might go for two. I predict that the union will try to present the union's idea on non-traditional compensation with perhaps an 18 month extension.
I am disgusted that the twu would assist the company in not giving us back what was taken. Amazed, no. Disgusted, yes.