Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This would be the newest member of my ignore list! While doing that I noticed there is a member titled 700UW-is-a-douche. What happened to that wonderful person? They should be here more often!700UW said:When you buy the board, then you can tell me and others what to do, if you dont like it, dont read it or use the ignore feature.
700UW said:Learn to read and comprehend:
PASSES
1. A Flight Attendant shall be provided on-line and interline pass benefits in accordance with Company Policy unless otherwise provided for in this Agreement. These benefits shall include retiree travel and survivors of deceased employee travel in accordance with Company policy. During the term of this Agreement, the Company shall not modify its pass policy to cap the number of times Flight Attendants, retired Flight Attendants, their spouses, eligible dependents and survivors, may utilize their space available travel privileges, to reduce their relative boarding priority with respect to other employee groups, or to otherwise substantially reduce this underlying benefit. This Paragraph shall not prevent the Company from making changes to the administration of the pass policy.
But....But....But....what about the two precedent setting grievances.700UW said:The seniority is in another part of their CBA, do you not understand there are two precedent setting grievances that preserves DOH for non-rev travel?
I find it difficult that most of you cant understand that concept.
Yah, precedent set to the PHX F/A's, yes our contract said benefits could not be diminished, but the east F/A's also had a contract provision that specifically covered pass travel. West considered seniority travel to be a diminishment of our ability to travel because we were merging with a more senior work group. The arbitrator ruled that the company would be violating a contract no matter which group he/she ruled with. So it was decided to award to the larger group (east) and offer a settlement to the smaller group (west).700UW said:Do you realize that the grievances won at US are precedent setting?
Oh you better not let 700UW find out.PHX-F/A said:Yah, precedent set to the PHX F/A's, yes our contract said benefits could not be diminished, but the east F/A's also had a contract provision that specifically covered pass travel. West considered seniority travel to be a diminishment of our ability to travel because we were merging with a more senior work group. The arbitrator ruled that the company would be violating a contract no matter which group he/she ruled with. So it was decided to award to the larger group (east) and offer a settlement to the smaller group (west).
I've heard that the grievance process has already acknowledge that the US side has already lost the case and it will go FCFS
+1WorldTraveler said:not worth the effort. it will be FCFS
700UW said:The seniority is in another part of their CBA, do you not understand there are two precedent setting grievances that preserves DOH for non-rev travel?
I find it difficult that most of you cant understand that concept.
...and when we start boarding as one airline in mid-summer (w/o a JCBA I might add), it wil NOT be "precedent setting", it will be business as usual, FCFS.700UW said:Its not my CBA, the AFA won an arbitration on it. another poster said he believed the grievance was denied when refiled, that isnt correct, it goes to the next step, but actually a grievance doesnt need to be filed as the arbitration is precedent setting and if the company changes it, the AFA goes to court.
I will see if I can find it.