MetalMover
Veteran
- Sep 16, 2013
- 3,543
- 2,410
Merry Christmas to you!A320 Driver said:I get your point, but after reading John Owen's financial breakdown of the latest offer, I am hopeful the BOD will send it out for a vote.
Merry Christmas!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Merry Christmas to you!A320 Driver said:I get your point, but after reading John Owen's financial breakdown of the latest offer, I am hopeful the BOD will send it out for a vote.
Merry Christmas!
luvthe9 said:JCBA NEGOTIATIONS JOINT PHL/CLT UPDATE
Fellow PHL Pilots
The APA BOD will re-convene on January 2, 2015 to evaluate and respond accordingly to the company JCBA counter-proposal.
The company apparently modified a few of their previous positions, and the Negotiating committee is currently working on a presentation to the BOD.
It should be noted that in accordance with the previous extension agreement, Messers Parker and Kirby have reneged on their commitment to allow a (45) day time period for pilot road shows and possible voting. They now demand that FINAL ratification needs to be accomplished by January 19, 2015. This totally unrealistic timeline would prevent you the pilots from receiving all of the information so as to be able to make an informed decision, should the BOD decide to send it out for a membership vote.
Congratulations to all of the employees that will receive the recently announced 4% pay raise, it is certainly well deserved.
One only has to look at the labor strife created by the recent NO vote and subsequent arbitration of the New American flight attendants, the contentious negotiations involving the pilots (conducted in the media), and the never miss an opportunity to throw a well deserved zinger at AA management by Delta CEO Richard Anderson, to understand the motives for the companies attempt at a face saving gesture. Not to be forgotten is the strong stance taken by (12) of the BOD members in the process.
Make no mistake about it, we feel that the recent company proposal is woefully inadequate, and in no way compensates the pilot group of the worlds largest and most profitable airline in an appropriate manner compared to our peers, considering total compensation or QOL issues. This issue may ultimately need to be decided by the membership.
We appreciate the feedback from many of you and understand and hear loud and clear your concerns and frustrations. We promise you that all of your input both for and against this offer will be conveyed by us to the BOD, in order that we can collectively make the best decision for all pilots moving forward.
In unity,
Paul DiOrio, Paul Music, Bob Frear, Ron Nelson
NOTE THE THE SAME TACTIC THAT WORKED BEFORE! THE NO TIME FOR THE ROAD SHOW LINE! KIND OF LIKE SOME WERE SUCKERD INTO VOTING FOR THE MOU!
luvthe9 said:JCBA NEGOTIATIONS JOINT PHL/CLT UPDATE
Fellow PHL Pilots
The APA BOD will re-convene on January 2, 2015 to evaluate and respond accordingly to the company JCBA counter-proposal.
The company apparently modified a few of their previous positions, and the Negotiating committee is currently working on a presentation to the BOD.
It should be noted that in accordance with the previous extension agreement, Messers Parker and Kirby have reneged on their commitment to allow a (45) day time period for pilot road shows and possible voting. They now demand that FINAL ratification needs to be accomplished by January 19, 2015. This totally unrealistic timeline would prevent you the pilots from receiving all of the information so as to be able to make an informed decision, should the BOD decide to send it out for a membership vote.
Congratulations to all of the employees that will receive the recently announced 4% pay raise, it is certainly well deserved.
One only has to look at the labor strife created by the recent NO vote and subsequent arbitration of the New American flight attendants, the contentious negotiations involving the pilots (conducted in the media), and the never miss an opportunity to throw a well deserved zinger at AA management by Delta CEO Richard Anderson, to understand the motives for the companies attempt at a face saving gesture. Not to be forgotten is the strong stance taken by (12) of the BOD members in the process.
Make no mistake about it, we feel that the recent company proposal is woefully inadequate, and in no way compensates the pilot group of the worlds largest and most profitable airline in an appropriate manner compared to our peers, considering total compensation or QOL issues. This issue may ultimately need to be decided by the membership.
We appreciate the feedback from many of you and understand and hear loud and clear your concerns and frustrations. We promise you that all of your input both for and against this offer will be conveyed by us to the BOD, in order that we can collectively make the best decision for all pilots moving forward.
In unity,
Paul DiOrio, Paul Music, Bob Frear, Ron Nelson
NOTE THE THE SAME TACTIC THAT WORKED BEFORE! THE NO TIME FOR THE ROAD SHOW LINE! KIND OF LIKE SOME WERE SUCKERD INTO VOTING FOR THE MOU!
Nope. It's called the union, as always, is unprepared. A day late and a dollar short.A320 Driver said:I don't think you could use the term "suckered in" to describe the numbers that voted in favor of the MOU.
All very good questions. Oh, Merry Christmas, Padre!!!nycbusdriver said:
Why road shows, anyway? We can all read. The telephone conference Town Hall meetings were a great way to get questions answered, as would be a Q&A website.
I appreciate that it's the holidays, but why are the BPR members not meeting on Monday and Tuesday, Dec 29 and 30, to hash this out? Last time I checked, those were not holidays (and the line grunts are at work.)
Given the last offer my the company, we now find ourselves (almost) exactly where the flight attendants were about 5 weeks ago, except we have a "cost neutral" arbitration hanging over our heads. Bottom line: Like the flight attendants, if we reject this company proposal, we will end up with, by definition, much less with an arbitration.
nevergiveup said:So what is the company's motive for not wanting us to vote? There has to be a reason. Do you trust them?
Since we can all read why in the world would anybody vote for an MOU with a "cost neutral" arbitration in it, still have not learned from the past, it really does not matter as we have no say in anything at this point, hope these boys can pull it out.nycbusdriver said:Why road shows, anyway? We can all read. ................
except we have a "cost neutral" arbitration hanging over our heads. Bottom line: Like the flight attendants, if we reject this company proposal, we will end up with, by definition, much less with an arbitration.
They never will, they are talking themselves into more concessions as we speak, with the usual suspects leading the chargeluvthe9 said:Since we can all read why in the world would anybody vote for an MOU with a "cost neutral" arbitration in it, still have not learned from the past, it really does not matter as we have no say in anything at this point, hope these boys can pull it out.
SLACKER! Where's it at.......?Phoenix said:T-22