oscarjazz said:
Seriously, do you guys not see the monumental butt whupping that you just took in that arbitration? Are you just trying to fool yourselves or do you really believe that you are winning the game? The funny part is that you pretty much hosed yourselves in the next arbitration and you don't even know it yet.
Is the decision out?
I love how all you guys say how these future events will go so definitively. I wish I was that confident about the future.
I actually see fairness in allowing the west a committee. After all, we know it's three lists, so it's logical that three parties represent them. I even suggested that to Humel. But the problem I see with it is that it's illogical, under MB, for the APA to be able to dictate that, and USAPA doesn't agree. Having one union dictate things is what got us MB! I think USAPA laid out a pretty good case for the legal reason of the west not getting a committee, and the rest for the fairness. We'll see who rules. I won't be placing a bet.
So jazz, since you're on the outside looking in, give me your perspective on this. I read the transcripts. Pauley was talking about the loss of leverage against AA if we use 3 merger committees. I see that for the west, but not the east. If we use three lists, and three merger committees, what does each one bring to the table? The west has no widebodies, one base, and most of it's pilots were hired pre-2005. What will the argue that they bring to the table? That's a big part of the award, right? Then we have the argument that the arbitrators won't like what we did to Nicolau's name. They might be right there, and if it didn't keep them from doing their job they may use it. But, there are some pretty much essential tenants of SLI-no bump, no flush and no reordering of the current lists. With that, the way I see it, if the panel uses the Nic, they will have to essentially give extra credit to the west guys that don't hold the higher positions that the Nic would have given them, and leave the east guys in those positions because they do have them. So essentially, US would be getting almost double the job credit, thus harming the AA guys. I just don't see them doing that to the AA guys.
In some ways I see it being easier for USAPA with three merger committees. They can take and even harder stance. Go in and say "This was our list, this was our fleet at the time of the merger. We have all this attrition on our side, look at our projected attrition, look at our hiring."
Another interesting year ahead.