cleardirect
Veteran
- May 24, 2008
- 6,234
- 9,749
- Banned
- #181
I hope that all of you east pilots read the release from the United merger committee. Read that and then go back and reread the releases from the AAA merger committee and MEC. The difference is black and white between rational thought and emotional rhetoric. These are the words of someone NOT involved in our fight. Some of you attack posters that are not US Ariways pilots or pilot for agreeing with the west. There are a whole lot of people that have looked at this and agree with us. You guys have put yourselves on an island with your continued demand of something that you were never going to get.
Here is the “new” ALPA merger policy that the east has been pointing to. Funny nowhere in there do I see DOH as some have taken to reading it.
I go back to my first comment. It the AAA MEC had been honest in the communication with the pilots your expectations would have been different and more realistic.
I think you guys have finally come to understand that you never had a vote on the list, just the contract. This also addresses the MDA concerns. Your seniority can not be reordered internally. So if you were furloughed and went to MDA and a guy senior to you was furloughed and did not go to MDA you cannot jump him on the list and he should not get some benefit of moving up the list because you decided to go work for some carrier. Find the most senior furloughed pilot and everyone else junior to him is furloughed, period stop go no further.
So for all of you guys that think AAA was treated any different than anyone else here you go. Furloughed pilots go to the bottom of the list. 1 year or 17 years furloughed is furloughed. Again here is a merger committee being honest with the pilots, telling them what could happen. Did the east MEC or MC ever tell you that furloughed pilots might be below active pilots? No! Then they failed to explain your expectations.
Again this goes back to the MEC/MC unrealistic promise of getting “DOH because that is the only fair way to do it”. Or the MC flat refusal to even discuss anything other than DOH/LOS because the east pilots would have removed them and replaced them with someone that would get DOH. None of you wanted to hear the truth and no one in a leadership role from the east had the guts to tell you that you were not going to get DOH/LOS. Imagine now if 5 years ago you had been told the truth and your expectation were not DOH. Where would we be now? A new contract and integrated operation. Possibly merged wit h someone as the largest airline in the world. Or now as the smallest hub and spoke and the lowest paid.
Once again pointing a finger straight at the east MEC/MC for promising DOH. For telling you that DOH/LOS was the only fair way to do this. That the arbitrator could not merge the list any other way. You east guys have left your mark on the industry for sure. That mark is how not to run a merger, before, during or after. If only the east leadership had been honest with you from the beginning this would have been different. But even now the new leadership at usapa is not being honest with pilots. They would rather spin an event then tell the truth.
A loss in district court makes them supremely confident of a win further on down the line. They expected to lose the district case, they expected to lose the injunction, they will tell you they expected to lose the LOA 93 grievance. Too bad east leadership never told you the truth that they expected to lose before the fact only after and only after they failed to honestly tell you what to expect.
Factors that must be considered in constructing a fair and equitable integrated seniority list in no particular order and with no particular weight include but are not limited to: career expectations, longevity, status and category.
Here is the “new” ALPA merger policy that the east has been pointing to. Funny nowhere in there do I see DOH as some have taken to reading it.
In the interest of fostering open communications between MECs, new policy language discourages arbitrators from admitting MEC communications as evidence.
I go back to my first comment. It the AAA MEC had been honest in the communication with the pilots your expectations would have been different and more realistic.
What has not changed is that the Integrated Seniority List is not subject to ratification by either MEC or pilot group. Another constant is a pilot’s position relative to his pre-merger brother or sister pilot: your internal relative seniority cannot be changed.
I think you guys have finally come to understand that you never had a vote on the list, just the contract. This also addresses the MDA concerns. Your seniority can not be reordered internally. So if you were furloughed and went to MDA and a guy senior to you was furloughed and did not go to MDA you cannot jump him on the list and he should not get some benefit of moving up the list because you decided to go work for some carrier. Find the most senior furloughed pilot and everyone else junior to him is furloughed, period stop go no further.
When we first met as a committee, we realized that one of the greatest challenges we would face was our work on behalf of our furloughed pilots. Past seniority integration arbitration awards have generally placed at least some pilots on furlough as of the date of the merger announcement at the bottom of the integrated list. While past decisions aren’t “binding” on future cases – each of which will turn on its own facts - and while ALPA Merger Policy has changed since those decisions were issued, we would be less than candid with you if we did not point out this historical treatment of furloughed pilots in seniority list integration arbitrations
So for all of you guys that think AAA was treated any different than anyone else here you go. Furloughed pilots go to the bottom of the list. 1 year or 17 years furloughed is furloughed. Again here is a merger committee being honest with the pilots, telling them what could happen. Did the east MEC or MC ever tell you that furloughed pilots might be below active pilots? No! Then they failed to explain your expectations.
What do you think they are talking about here? Could it be the position of the east MEC/MC and your refusal to accept credible positions supported by facts and logic? We have been telling you that everyone else in the industry knows who and what the east pilots are and how you operate.Subject only to the caveat that experience in seniority integration arbitration tells us that to be effective with the arbitrators we have to maintain credible positions supported by facts and logic rather than emotion,
We pledge to communicate with you frequently, openly and candidly: it may not always be what you want to hear, but it will be the unvarnished truth.
Again this goes back to the MEC/MC unrealistic promise of getting “DOH because that is the only fair way to do it”. Or the MC flat refusal to even discuss anything other than DOH/LOS because the east pilots would have removed them and replaced them with someone that would get DOH. None of you wanted to hear the truth and no one in a leadership role from the east had the guts to tell you that you were not going to get DOH/LOS. Imagine now if 5 years ago you had been told the truth and your expectation were not DOH. Where would we be now? A new contract and integrated operation. Possibly merged wit h someone as the largest airline in the world. Or now as the smallest hub and spoke and the lowest paid.
In this instance, that noise and confusion stems directly from the many hypothetical seniority scenarios promulgated by those who claim to be in the “know.” They may even claim that certain methodologies are more relevant than others. We urge you to resist the temptation to succumb to the noise. Those of us who have been thinking about seniority integration in general and integration with Continental in particular - including your Merger Committee and its supporting professionals who have participated in all of the recent merger activity in the industry - are unwilling to “predict” at this early stage how the integration will turn out.
Once again pointing a finger straight at the east MEC/MC for promising DOH. For telling you that DOH/LOS was the only fair way to do this. That the arbitrator could not merge the list any other way. You east guys have left your mark on the industry for sure. That mark is how not to run a merger, before, during or after. If only the east leadership had been honest with you from the beginning this would have been different. But even now the new leadership at usapa is not being honest with pilots. They would rather spin an event then tell the truth.
A loss in district court makes them supremely confident of a win further on down the line. They expected to lose the district case, they expected to lose the injunction, they will tell you they expected to lose the LOA 93 grievance. Too bad east leadership never told you the truth that they expected to lose before the fact only after and only after they failed to honestly tell you what to expect.