Nic4us, sorry I cannot agree with the part about the ARBITRATED AWARD IS NOT GOING AWAY part. I really do not see how that will hold up. I am going with a very reliable source on this one. Everything is open at this point. Seniority is negotiable. I am not going to say Parker will ACCEPT a DOH list either if it is presented. He may have other ideas. But I do believe USAPA will deliver the DOH list with C&R's to him. Regards.
Parker's motivations are seperate from those of usapa which are seperate from AOL's. Who passes, accepts, or sues over whichever list is not my point in saying the Nic is not going away.
Lets use a hypothetical to illustrate my point. Lets say USAPA decides that a contract with the Nic is unratifiable, but that also a straight DOH list is unratifiable, so they come up with new conditions and restrictions that say West LOS will be credited at 2 to 1 over east LOS. They then formulate a list where the top 1000 pilots are former West. When the top 517 sue, which they obviously would and rightfully so, what document are they going to point to as evidence of how they have been harmed?
The Nic is not merely a suggestion of how it ought to be. It is the only mutually agree upon, contractually mandated method of integration. It will always be the baseline for comparison from which a determination of motivations will be derived. USAPA's arguement that a Nic contract would be unratifiable is speculative because it was never put to the test. All USAPA has is "we do not think it is fair". Well of course you do not, that is the nature of binding arbitration, and why you are there in the first place.