The lesson to be learned is that you are much better off negotiating from a realistic set of goals and expectations rather than digging into an untenable situation and then refusing to move. (sound familiar?)
Oscar,
Very much enjoy your posts, it is great to have level headed third party input into the otherwise he said she said food fight.
Your conclusion was also reached by the United Negotiating committee and published after the Nic came out. Further, the exact same conclusion was reached by the Northwest Negotiating committee and published immediately post Nic. Perhaps that had something to do with the ability of the Northwest pilots to understand how to quantify their situation and proceed when merging with your group.
I am not seeking a validation from you, however I have posted many times that the biggest problem in our situation is that the east pilots did not, and still do not, understand the position they were/are in, and are therefore are unable to set the realistic goals and expectations in order to achieve the best possible outcome for their group. Ironically, Nic gave it to them anyway. The only thing they possible could have achieved better than the Nic, was the Nic with a few greater protections, such as longer fencing etc.
Until a few very basic concepts are understood and accepted by the east, they have little hope of improving their position in this situation.
First and foremost of which is a new company was formed, and a new seniority list was arbitrated.
Second, the West pilots were not integrated into their list, no West pilot jumped ahead of an east pilot. All pilots were combined based on practices mandated in the company's letter of labor priciples, ALPA merger policy, and the dictates of the Transition Agreement.
Finally, it is not a valid union objective to steal from a minority what you did not deserve, are never going to get and were denied in binding arbitration.