Oh indeed they do Bob, or they wouldn't have put it in the term sheet.
Then why did they already "agree" to less? In 2003 the company said 25% in concessions or thousands of jobs, when the committee said take the jobs the company and the International withdrew the offer. They ended up taking both. Fast Forward, we are once again "saving jobs" but giving them the language to outsource them anyway. Any guess on how this could turn out?
I suspect you will stay in denial to the bitter end. They want headcount down and bodies off the payroll.
Then give it to them, because they will get it anyway but keep the job a good job to come back to.
Just like BK was not an idle threat, neither is outsourcing. It is a certainty, the goal now should be to minimize it to whatever extent possible.
I did not say it wasnt a threat, just not as much as they claimed. The goal should be to preserve Union scales and benefits, both Delta and Jet Blue are ahead of us.
I mentioned NW & UA losing thousands of M&R jobs because they are the carriers with the most in common with your present situation... (BK and facing outsourcing).
Yes and when they went into BK the largest carrier in the country, their biggest competitor , American Airlines, which already had OSMs in place, had agreed to 25% in concessions. They had no choice but to outsource, plus at the time everyone was laying off so the MROs had a glut of mechanics.
Obviously SW and Airtran have not been through BK and have nothing to offer as comparison to your situation, why do you keep bringing them up?
Why wouldnt I? Their mechanics do the same thing I do, they just get paid a lot more.
I don't understand why you keep mixing BK and mergers in your posts, the merger is only an IF, the BK and the outsourcing is a REALITY and every airline that went through it cut M&R and outsourced. You better believe AA means to do it.
Then why agree to concessions? We are already at the bottom, why lgo even lower if they are going to cut what they want anyway?
AA labor is on the edge of the cliff and needs to find a solution to save as much of their quality of work life and as many jobs as they can.
A choice will have to be made, numbers of people paying dues or quality of the Job. If you choose numbers everyone loses, if you choose quality, those who lack seniority suffer but have something to go back to. When the next "push" happens they will have the seniority. What we have been engaged in is a vicious circle that just keeps repeating itself. Like I said I've been laid off, saw companies I work for liquidate, it sucks, but I never thought that we should lower everyones wages so I would not get laid off. I was confident that one day I would have the senioirity and not be the guy to hit the streets. I had something to look forward to, its one of the reasons I went into this industry. Layoffs instead of concessions is the price we must pay for a better future. Concessions for jobs simply rewards the employer for not running his business properly and it will only end when workers will no longer show up.