MetalMover
Veteran
- Sep 16, 2013
- 3,543
- 2,410
That's only one reason. The divide and conquer tactics that have driven a wedge between line and OH is another. But what has been in place was TUL's "roll call" vote. Whatever TUL wanted TUL got. But that changed somewhat, hasn't it? It will change further as OH numbers decrease while the line's numbers increase. You do realize they are hiring line mechanics throughout the system, don't you? I bet that "roll call" vote doesn't look all that good now.NYer said:
And that's your reason to want change? That's the reason there needs to be cut from the TWU, IAM and Association. So that you can make changes on a whim? That's of course, if you happen to be the majority that wants the change and if you're not (as you are here in the TWU) then no change can happen. The thing is that the majority is empowered to make change, but you don't happen to be that majority and unless you are (whether here or elsewhere) you can't get what you want.
Again, there were about 20,000 Members in AMFA and now there are 2,000. That's a pretty strong voice for me. Even stronger still when the pro-AMFA group hasn't been able to make a dent in organizing. No thanks. I'd rather not jump off the cliff just because it's there.
Was the TWU NOT the first to introduce the B scale? Mechanic work transferred to fleet service?
You can keep quoting about the loss of AMFA numbers all you want. Many of us still want change.
I think that the main reason for those TWU supporters being anti-AMFA is their alleged apathy for those who work OH and OH work in general.