No I did not have toast with my coffee..........
What the hell are you talking about Bob??? What does my post have to do with red white and blue? I do not know if a signature title is the deciding consideration for determining who might be willing crossing a picket line, but it seems unlikely.
A Simple yes or no would have done,
Your post, that I responded to was about AMFA members who scabbed.
Such responses are the reason why many do not trust the IBT. You dont find it odd that someone who claims to be a Unionist identifies so strongly with the company he works for that he uses the company LOGO and a made up title to identify himself when he corresponds with other union workers? That tells us a lot about you and your beliefs.
The way I see such a signature, where the TWU is not bolded and the American Airlines is, the person wishes to emphaisze his association with American Airlines more so than his association with the TWU. Maybe in the IBT they do the same thing, perhaps at UPS they would put it all in brown lettering and have UPS in bold like this;
Apointed Business Agent
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Made up title thats soulnds like management
United Parcel Service
But thankfully I've never seen anything like that. I find it troubling that our Union allows it. To me it shows that many within our organization have more loyalty to American Airlines than the workers they claim they are representing (from their unelected positions). Its omething that we need to address.
As a unionist can you agree that if you are going to use the highest degree of self help available and go on strike, your union should be fully prepared for a full and lengthy encounter?
Since you asked I will respond, and unlike you I will actually answer the question, someday maybe you will realize thats all the members want, truthful answers. Its not really that hard to do, unless you feel a need to hide the truth.
Yes, to the highest degree possible. Was the IBT fully prepared to take on Overnight Trucking? I watched both films, Red Tail and American Standoff, and followed the NWA story as it unfolded, and was proud when I saw IBT drivers in New York (Carey Country) turn their trucks around rather than cross the picket lines.They recognized Unionists even if those at the top didn't.
53% of AMFA members were to vote away their jobs, are you saying the IBT would have accepted such a deal?
amfa went all in on a pair of twos and hoped the company had a worse hand, although every indication was that NWA was completely ready for the battle, and had trained plenty of replacement workers. amfa was simply not ready, nor did they have the resources needed, but they lead their mechanics out any way. The were doomed from the start.
And with the resources of over 1 million members the IBT failed miserably at Overnight Trucking. Are you saying that the IBT never should have tried to organize Overnight or that the AMFA should have told more than half their members to accept a deal that would eliminate more than half the jobs and cut pay and benefits for those who remained?
Even the President of the United States turned his back on the striking workers, but amfa stubbornly marched on.
Are you saying Bush would have supported a Teamster strike? After all the IBT did support his father didnt they? Remember this was 2005, even though Bush II and Hoffa openly flirted with each other prior to the 2004 election in the end Hoffa didnt give the younger Bush his support.