- Aug 20, 2002
- 7,319
- 1,555
What do you know about the PIT airport authority or the City of Pittsburgh charging the airline for it's facility ?700UW said:I see the company wanting to close PIT Heavy and move it to CLT and TUL.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you know about the PIT airport authority or the City of Pittsburgh charging the airline for it's facility ?700UW said:I see the company wanting to close PIT Heavy and move it to CLT and TUL.
So did AFW and MCI. We had contracts in place. Protection? Now that's funny. It's almost as funny as the no lay off clause we had in our twu contract several years back. Bases still closed and guys got laid off. Contracts are a one way deal. We have live by them and the company can violate them.700UW said:CLT isn't anywhere it's protected and has a line and heavy hangars.
as soon as all the deals are cut.Shafted said:Anyone know when or if the transfer lists will be frozen?
With the closure of TASEL and only 100 positions at DWH that is700UW said:I see the company wanting to close PIT Heavy and move it to CLT and TUL.
1AA said:Well since HDQ is in DFW, how about bringing work in from CLT. Make CLT a gas and go hub. Just saying.
Sorry to rub you the wrong way. Not my intent. With the TWU in the mix anything is possible. If you think about it. Does AA need that many bases to do heavy work? Parker had mentioned plenty of times about not being in the MRO and overhaul business. Look at the amount of outsourcing at USAIR and the current outsourcing we just did in Bankruptcy. We have Phoenix, Tulsa, DWH, Charlotte and Pittsburgh. If we are outsourcing how do we keep 5 bases operating? I'm just posting what I have seen, heard from the company and fellow workers. The association is kind of hush hush about everything.bigjets said:You must be from TUL, screw everyone to protect me. CLT is the #2 Hub for AA, I don't see CLT shrinking too much if at all.
Sorry OS but I'm pretty sure that they are already figuring out that there's no way that they can do phase checks on the line with over 900 aircraft. Besides the fact they don't have enough stations with enough mechanics the sheer logistics of scheduling issues involved along with parts availability. They have scaled back the class 2 stations a long time ago and to spool up an operation to handle that many phase checks would be a fools errand and doomed to fail. But I would not put it past this team of management clowns.Overspeed said:One thing for sure is that the net result of a JCBA will involve some base consolidation and possibly the line as well. If the LUS Aircraft MX model carriers over which it looks like it is, then we will see more engine and component work being outsourced and a shift away from LAA block B and C type checks. The LUS way seems to be all NBs are done in a phased LC on the line and HC in-house and outsourced.
Goey said:Sorry OS but I'm pretty sure that they are already figuring out that there's no way that they can do phase checks on the line with over 900 aircraft. Besides the fact they don't have enough stations with enough mechanics the sheer logistics of scheduling issues involved along with parts availability. They have scaled back the class 2 stations a long time ago and to spool up an operation to handle that many phase checks would be a fools errand and doomed to fail. But I would not put it past this team of management clowns.
Steve Goeyvaerts
SFO A/C Maintenance
1AA said:Sorry to rub you the wrong way. Not my intent. With the TWU in the mix anything is possible. If you think about it. Does AA need that many bases to do heavy work? Parker had mentioned plenty of times about not being in the MRO and overhaul business. Look at the amount of outsourcing at USAIR and the current outsourcing we just did in Bankruptcy. We have Phoenix, Tulsa, DWH, Charlotte and Pittsburgh. If we are outsourcing how do we keep 5 bases operating? I'm just posting what I have seen, heard from the company and fellow workers. The association is kind of hush hush about everything.
I agree on the ole saying about moving to Tulsa, but I look at it as we are all AMT'S. Unfortunately the twu created that animosity between line and overhaul for over 30 or 40 years.bigjets said:not offended, just still bitter after decades of "if you don't like it, move to Tulsa" funny how they like to bring up the, we are all union brothers BS now.
Oh I am sure the IAM guys would just love agree to anything to save TUL jobs.1AA said:Sorry to rub you the wrong way. Not my intent. With the TWU in the mix anything is possible. If you think about it. Does AA need that many bases to do heavy work? Parker had mentioned plenty of times about not being in the MRO and overhaul business. Look at the amount of outsourcing at USAIR and the current outsourcing we just did in Bankruptcy. We have Phoenix, Tulsa, DWH, Charlotte and Pittsburgh. If we are outsourcing how do we keep 5 bases operating? I'm just posting what I have seen, heard from the company and fellow workers. The association is kind of hush hush about everything.