PITbull
Veteran
- Dec 29, 2002
- 7,784
- 456
This type of "public exposure" I would hope, is going to get the "accuser" her just desserts. The ramblings on this board are a true testiment of her character or lack there of. You know her MO, you have been on the receiving end of the barrel, but all is good now because she can further YOUR agenda.
You don't fool me, and there are many here that are not your sheep from PIT. Granted part of your flock exists and Terry staggers among them as you try to prop her up. But on September 28, you won't be there to prop her up, she'll be on her own, with her "opening staement" lacking proof and being unable to support the charges, and the witch hunt will come to a crashing end. Once again PB, you'll find yourself out in the cold tending your flock from afar.
Hula,
Fool you??? I don't even know you.
I don't have an agenda, covert or overt.
I have been speaking my mind for many years; on this forum and others.
The members don't need to prove anything for a recall of an officer and according to AFA Constitution.
A vote of "no confidence", unless the officer can prove otherwise, is enough.
Hey, its pretty warm where I'm at...Happy travels B)