Oregon Shooting

[townpete]

 
Does she speak for all the families?   I swear to God, I have have read maybe 100 articles from pro gun folks talking about how great guns are.  None of them offered any kind of sympathy or condolences to the families of the victims.  Just 'it wouldn't have happened if everyone was armed".   BTW...why is it that anyone who links to Huffington Post is linking to a biased site, but brietbart is considered legit?    And a whole 8,000 supporters on Facebook.  That's a lot.  Wait...how many Facebook accounts are there?  1.5 billion? 

 
I doubt you read even one article.
 
Also the CNN link mentioned it as well.
 
So there's that.....
 
Carry on with your hysterics....

 

[KCFlyer]

 
I doubt you read even one article.
 
Also the CNN link mentioned it as well.
 
So there's that.....
 
Carry on with your hysterics....

 
Actually...most of the folks you disagree with read many articles....even brietbart.  See...one way to learn is to read one extreme, then another extreme. The truth is somewhere in the middle.  When the only things you read or watch is brietbart and Fox, odds are you are getting a rather slanted view.  
 
And to put things in perspective for you....there are 4 million people who live in Oregon alone.  There are 300,000,000 people who live in the US.  8,000 followers on facebook is not all that much.  

 

[townpete]

 
Actually...most of the folks you disagree with read many articles....even brietbart.  See...one way to learn is to read one extreme, then another extreme. The truth is somewhere in the middle.  When the only things you read or watch is brietbart and Fox, odds are you are getting a rather slanted view.  
 
And to put things in perspective for you....there are 4 million people who live in Oregon alone.  There are 300,000,000 people who live in the US.  8,000 followers on facebook is not all that much.  

Translation:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKXjk3JexSg
 
lol

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

Actually...most of the folks you disagree with read many articles....even brietbart.  See...one way to learn is to read one extreme, then another extreme. The truth is somewhere in the middle.  When the only things you read or watch is brietbart and Fox, odds are you are getting a rather slanted view.  
 
And to put things in perspective for you....there are 4 million people who live in Oregon alone.  There are 300,000,000 people who live in the US.  8,000 followers on facebook is not all that much.

You are speaking at someone who, when confronted with factual evidence of posting outright lies (albeit parrots from his sole source of information), will post cartoon meme's.

He will slink away slowly as he realizes that he is simply laughing stock.

 

[Dog Wonder]

LOL.

 

[townpete]

You are speaking at someone who, when confronted with factual evidence of posting outright lies (albeit parrots from his sole source of information), will post cartoon meme's.
He will slink away slowly as he realizes that he is simply laughing stock.

Psst....Still here, four years prior to you.

Ain't going anywhere toots.

 

[Kev3188]

 
Actually...most of the folks you disagree with read many articles....even brietbart.  See...one way to learn is to read one extreme, then another extreme. The truth is somewhere in the middle.  When the only things you read or watch is brietbart and Fox, odds are you are getting a rather slanted view.  
 
And to put things in perspective for you....there are 4 million people who live in Oregon alone.  There are 300,000,000 people who live in the US.  8,000 followers on facebook is not all that much.  

Southern Oregon leans to the right, but the freakshow that greeted Obama today doesn't accurately represent them at all...

 

[Hackman]

LOL.

DUD.

 

[Hackman]

Southern Oregon leans to the right, but the freakshow that greeted Obama today doesn't accurately represent them at all...

Is Obammy mad bro?  What about the freak show in the leftist anti-gun mecca of Chiraq? How are all the gun laws working in the murder capital of Illinois? Not so well?
 
When will Obammy politicize all the murders and shootings in the Windy City, and travel to Chiraq to "comfort families"? 
 
I guess murder only matters when he can sensationalize it to try to get America to swallow his real agenda as a failed libtard POTUS. Full and complete US Federal government gun confiscation and the repeal of the 2nd Amendment.
 
That will be the start of the 2nd Civil War caused by Obammy and his minions.
 
I hope the leftists are ready for it.

 

[Kev3188]

Couldn't tell ya; you'll have to ask an Illinois native.

Meanwhile, this thread is about an act of domestic terrorism in Roseburg, Oregon.

 

[KCFlyer]

Is Obammy mad bro?  What about the freak show in the leftist anti-gun mecca of Chiraq? How are all the gun laws working in the murder capital of Illinois? Not so well?
 
When will Obammy politicize all the murders and shootings in the Windy City, and travel to Chiraq to "comfort families"? 
 
I guess murder only matters when he can sensationalize it to try to get America to swallow his real agenda as a failed libtard POTUS. Full and complete US Federal government gun confiscation and the repeal of the 2nd Amendment.
 
That will be the start of the 2nd Civil War caused by Obammy and his minions.
 
I hope the leftists are ready for it.

 
On the one hand...you are right...the murder rate in Chicago is atrocious.  On the other hand....pretty much all those that are murdered are also carrying guns.  In that case, they are "lawbreakers".  So are you saying that if we only eliminated the Chicago gun laws, that murder rate would drop?  Everybody there is already armed - yet the murders continue. 

 

[townpete]

On the one hand...you are right...the murder rate in Chicago is atrocious.  On the other hand....pretty much all those that are murdered are also carrying guns.  In that case, they are "lawbreakers".  So are you saying that if we only eliminated the Chicago gun laws, that murder rate would drop?  Everybody there is already armed - yet the murders continue.

Umm you really aren't that bright are you?

The majority of said violence is gang on gang violence.

Take few minutes to chew on that.

Then you'll understand why what you said is pretty much idiotic.

 

[KCFlyer]

Umm you really aren't that bright are you?

The majority of said violence is gang on gang violence.

Take few minutes to chew on that.

Then you'll understand why what you said is pretty much idiotic.

 
Okay...I'm chewing.  Gang on gang violence.  One side of the gang is considered "bad guys with guns".  The other side of the gang is considered "good guys with guns".  Everybody is armed.  Killings continue.  Now...the right likes to say that if everybody was armed, our violent crime rate would drop.  But Chicago proves otherwise.   When someone on the right screams about "gun control"...they point to Chicago...the city with some of the strictest gun control laws in the country..and "Obammy" doesn't do anything about it.  When it is pointed out that in Chicago...those that are being killed because of the gun control laws most likely died with a gun on their person...they respond with "it's gang on gang violence".   It would seem that the "bad guys with guns" aren't deterred because someone else might be carrying a gun. 
 
But the solution to these problems is to arm everybody.  Then a guy who plans on dying while shooting up a school or a theater will be too afraid to try it since he might get killed by "a good guy with a gun".  Think about that one.  Odds are, he's going to get at least 5 people in his spree before the good guys with guns in the crowd realize what is going on...that's called "processing the situation"...and responding.  THEN he gets killed by a good guy with a gun.  But he was either going to kill himself, or he PLANNED on getting killed by someone else.  But the fact remains....he still killed 5 people.  
 
And given that MOST good guys with guns haven't ever shot at another human being...and havent' been in a situation where they needed to shoot there gun while they  were among several other law abiding human beings.....they will either delay in making sure their aim is good (allowing more innocents to be shot up by the madman), or they will start firing willy nilly into a crowd of people...hoping that they hit the bad guy. 

 

[townpete]

 
On the one hand...you are right...the murder rate in Chicago is atrocious.  On the other hand....pretty much all those that are murdered are also carrying guns.  In that case, they are "lawbreakers".  So are you saying that if we only eliminated the Chicago gun laws, that murder rate would drop?  Everybody there is already armed - yet the murders continue. 

 
Statistically speaking, after Chicago allowed CC crime rate dropped, except for one metric. GANG on GANG violence
 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/24/chicago-crime-rate-drops-as-concealed-carry-gun-pe/?page=all
 
Statistics prove it as well. The highest concentration is:
 
Black or Hispanic Males
In the worst neighborhoods
By known criminals/repeat offenders with gang affiliations
 
http://heyjackass.com/category/2015-chicago-crime-murder-stats/

 

[townpete]

 
Okay...I'm chewing.  Gang on gang violence.  One side of the gang is considered "bad guys with guns".  The other side of the gang is considered "good guys with guns".  Everybody is armed.  Killings continue.  Now...the right likes to say that if everybody was armed, our violent crime rate would drop.  But Chicago proves otherwise.   When someone on the right screams about "gun control"...they point to Chicago...the city with some of the strictest gun control laws in the country..and "Obammy" doesn't do anything about it.  When it is pointed out that in Chicago...those that are being killed because of the gun control laws most likely died with a gun on their person...they respond with "it's gang on gang violence".   It would seem that the "bad guys with guns" aren't deterred because someone else might be carrying a gun. 
 
But the solution to these problems is to arm everybody.  Then a guy who plans on dying while shooting up a school or a theater will be too afraid to try it since he might get killed by "a good guy with a gun".  Think about that one.  Odds are, he's going to get at least 5 people in his spree before the good guys with guns in the crowd realize what is going on...that's called "processing the situation"...and responding.  THEN he gets killed by a good guy with a gun.  But he was either going to kill himself, or he PLANNED on getting killed by someone else.  But the fact remains....he still killed 5 people.  
 
And given that MOST good guys with guns haven't ever shot at another human being...and havent' been in a situation where they needed to shoot there gun while they  were among several other law abiding human beings.....they will either delay in making sure their aim is good (allowing more innocents to be shot up by the madman), or they will start firing willy nilly into a crowd of people...hoping that they hit the bad guy. 

 
Hey buttercup, when its gang on gang violence...both are bad guys.
 
Where do you even come up with this horsesh!t?