Okay...I'm chewing. Gang on gang violence. One side of the gang is considered "bad guys with guns". The other side of the gang is considered "good guys with guns". Everybody is armed. Killings continue. Now...the right likes to say that if everybody was armed, our violent crime rate would drop. But Chicago proves otherwise. When someone on the right screams about "gun control"...they point to Chicago...the city with some of the strictest gun control laws in the country..and "Obammy" doesn't do anything about it. When it is pointed out that in Chicago...those that are being killed because of the gun control laws most likely died with a gun on their person...they respond with "it's gang on gang violence". It would seem that the "bad guys with guns" aren't deterred because someone else might be carrying a gun.
But the solution to these problems is to arm everybody. Then a guy who plans on dying while shooting up a school or a theater will be too afraid to try it since he might get killed by "a good guy with a gun". Think about that one. Odds are, he's going to get at least 5 people in his spree before the good guys with guns in the crowd realize what is going on...that's called "processing the situation"...and responding. THEN he gets killed by a good guy with a gun. But he was either going to kill himself, or he PLANNED on getting killed by someone else. But the fact remains....he still killed 5 people.
And given that MOST good guys with guns haven't ever shot at another human being...and havent' been in a situation where they needed to shoot there gun while they were among several other law abiding human beings.....they will either delay in making sure their aim is good (allowing more innocents to be shot up by the madman), or they will start firing willy nilly into a crowd of people...hoping that they hit the bad guy.