jenny@nw
Veteran
Ok, Mistah Platoon Leader- you tell me what you would do in this analogy.I dont see that as bad faith by NWA, rather bad planning by AMFA. The situation as I see it was thus: Amfa states that the new terms are unaccepteble, and if imposed will result in a strike. Fair enough, and in good faith. Nwa states that if AMFA strikes, they will be replaced.
You are looking out for your troops. Suddenly your group is caught.
Later on you are with your men building the bridge over river Kwai. Work conditions are ok and reasonable. Your captors,however - seeing that the food supply is becoming more and more depleted decides that they need to "let go" or do away with half your men.
You negotiate and tell them it's not acceptable.
Then they bring to the table that MORE people need to be cut (easier to kill), and the remaining men now need to work even LONGER hours. Food rations are 1/3.
You negotiate and tell them its not acceptable.
You keep emphasizing the Geneva convention that everyone is suppose to abide by. All they do is laugh in your face.
Now they are going to use the local natives who never held the hammer before or even have engineering background to finish the bridge.
Your men are all tortured, slaughtered or escaped into the jungle. Takes them a few months but now the men that escaped found their way back or figured out a way to sustain themselves.
Tell me if you were...the AMFA lawyers and the negotiating team what would you have done. This was all a ploy to make other workgroups give in.
I must say in all of this the AMFA lawyers did a superb job of looking out for the MX.