Nope Feel for those 40 guys. Honestly, that is a big reason why I wouldn't want to leave Atlanta.
Most of the time when they DGS you, you can still move to another shop. Hard to do that outside of ATL. (MSP would be the 2nd safest place, but I'm sure they will Dallas it at some point......so maybe Mexico)
They will take a voluntary leave as the last resort. Delta will offer an early out for DTW. Then see what happens. After that they will give everyone a list of opening to bid. If you don't want to bid then you get a package to leave.
They have open AMT spots all over.
Delta needs bodies in TechOps.... more should be coming out on this soon. (might be a lot of pissed off AMTs...but they will be okay)
They don't do that WT. If they say 40 will go, 40 will go.
The biggest question is will 40 go and 20-30 contractors come in.
yep.
At least for Delta. Who knows, may see some spots open for DGS.
generally Line does do quicker work than Hangar. I know they can generally get an engine change done faster if it isn't done in ATL/MSP
Its a reduction in RON/RAD. They may be trying to flow even more of those checks over the maint. bases than last year. IIRC they had a record number of RON/RADs done at the hangar in Atlanta last summer.
The PSV lines slow down, or stop completely. So they are trying to fill those bays with more RADsRONs
while they are getting new to Delta aircraft, outside of the 739s, the other aircraft coming in (717s/M90s) are old enough that they aren't going to save on much MX time.
and really, because the bulk of the 717s are growth(for mainline) aircraft, it is really covering up the removing of 757s with 739s.
TechOps is a little thin as I said above.
Welcome to the airlines.
The only thing that would maybe happen is they get money to move. It doesn't sound like any of these guys will have to leave Delta. DTW? yes, but Delta should have enough AMT jobs to go around. (and it doesn't sound like they are going to get #### canned into a high cost station. I bet all of them will get offered a spot in ATL and or MSP along with other line stations.)
I don't know why this keeps coming up. Yes, Delta does have the ASM program, but out of like 12,000 people at TechOps I think ASMs are like 2,000 system wide. (compared to like 7,000-8,000 AMTs.)
A good bit of work that is done by ASMs is sent out of house at other airlines. (IIRC UAL, for example, doesn't do the cabin work in house that Delta does with ASMs)
also, things like plane washing, parts washing etc. Are done by non-A&Ps. Again, this is work that would simply be gone if it wasn't for the ASM/MUE program.
Also, till recently Delta did a good job of flowing the ASMs with there tickets up to AMTs. Its getting a little back logged but it sounds like its going to be addressed somewhat. (and thats not all Delta's fault, people just aren't leaving as fast)
as for the singing, I don't know how it works for sure once the cards leave the floor, but at Delta you sign with your employee number for you work. AMT or ASM. I haven't ever seen an AMT signing for work done by an ASM. (of course, I don't know how it works once things get upstairs or outside of ATL)
So if an ASM does a filter change on an engine, the ASM signs his name and his employee number. If an AMT does the same work then the AMT signs his name and employee number.
I mean I know you hard core pro-union guys just hate the idea of having someone without an A&P working on airplanes or even in the hangar.....and your just as out of touch with reality as the outsource everything group. Delta has a great balance of it and it has saved a ton of work that would be gone if it wasn't for those jobs. Delta is sucking with the influx of contractors for sure....but they do a good job with the ASMs. Its not like the bulk of a PSV line is done by an ASM.
Of course some of you guys also think 60 bucks an hour is only fair too. stupidity like that is a big reason why the craft is dying.
in this case it would be laid out in the contract how things would be done. That would be it. SCOPE would be SCOPE. Work rules would be work rules. etc. etc. Thats not how it is at Delta. At the end of the day you do what your told. (but! on my side at least, they don't tend to make crap up on the fly. Sure you may have a crap head lead or foreman, but I see a lot more rules broken than taken advantage of.)
but I have heard my fair share of stories from the ramp.
Delta seems to change how they handle reductions every time it happens. Generally it depends on the size of the cutting.
During BK they did more bumping and such because of the large scale of people heading out the door and stations closing, reducing etc. Now days they do a good job of finding a job or adding a spot in a different shop that needs the help.
A good example, The contract bays had to lose 60 AMTs when World left. So Delta added 60 AMT spots in back shops, the engine shop, Test cell and PSV bays. I don't believe anyone had to leave Atlanta. Heck some of those guys were happy to get to move to the Engine shop/cell. (no idea why....but that seems to be a dream job for a ton of people)
now if 1,000 people had to go.... more than likely they would have allowed bumping and stuff like that. (could be ATL only or system wide)
I, personally, don't have a preference. I like that they really try to inconvenience the least amount of people possible, but on the flip side I'd be pretty pissed if I could hold a spot in say MCO but got stuck going to LGA/LAX/JFK while someone 10 years junior to me is holding a MCO spot.
Also Delta does look at the ripple effect. The way they are handling DTW wont effect the company like allowing bumps would.