To me it's mind boggling that self proclaimed "trade unionists" and "labor activists" condone bumping junior employees from an unaffected station when there is a RIF. Yes I understand that's the language many CBAs have and you guys feel tenure, not merit or performance should be the driving force in the workplace. I just don't see how the labor movement feels it is fair to displace a more junior person-who makes less on the sacks to be displaced from a non-impacted location to accommodate a senior employee who loses their job at an other location. It would seem the senior employee he elal is more able to weather a time of unemployment given higher wages, savings, etc but may have more difficultly securing other employment due to their age. Would you guys please enlighten me on this one?
Josh
Josh