Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, we have tech crew chiefs who support the operation. They are not general crew chiefs, or leads as US has. I believe at US they are tech supervisors.700UW said:Tech crew chief?
Do you not have access to the TWU CBA?700UW said:MOC which is Maintenance Control are part of the M&R CBA.
They have line foreman, but they dont touch planes.
Can you be a bit more specific please?
Overspeed said:
Name calling. How creative. Must have blown out a few brain cells on that one word response.
Following your path of selective accountability has worked for you how?
Rogallo said:
Truth hurts, ehh?
Insults. You're very creative too.
700UW said:Sounds like MOC at US and they are under the M&R CBA.
And the NMB would have handled the situation as they did with the planners, at US planners were union and at AA they weren't, the board accredited that group.
Overspeed said:
Truth? In the subjective sense only. Again, the dodge. You only hold certain people accountable.
No. It's called the Maintenance Training Department.Overspeed said:
The easiest way to look at it is that AA Maintenance Control Technicians work in IOC/MOC. Tech Crew Chiefs work only at the Line and Base and work as instructors, OJT trainers, and work with AMTs on the floor on new procedures and trouble aircraft. The MCTs at AA are in a separate book but are M&R per the NMB. Integrating the AA MCTs and US MOC. Sounds like they do the same job. Does US have CCs in the field that are like trainers and field tech support?
Now, Now, I only have 31 years of bad TWU experiences out of 31 years. Don't make such a big deal out of it.....2ndGENAMT said:Most of us have years of experience with the TWU, and it has been a negative one at least for myself and most of my peers!
So no word about any of the other non-union positions that the NMB are forcing to become unionized?MetalMover said:And yet, NOT one update as to WHAT they discussed during each session, not ONE update. They claim to be discussing language, but WHAT language?
I know for a fact that LEAD/CREW CHIEF seniority is a major sticking point. The other is AA tech crew chiefs are union, but their tech counterparts at US are management.
The Catholic Church removed some of its Pious members that were accused of actions with younger members of the church. Perhaps if the membership had such an ability these individuals you are mad at would behave differently.Overspeed said:
Yes we are sick of a lot of things. So moving forward what are the current 514, 567, and 591 officers doing to move the process along and get us to the table? Instead of having two day and three day sessions how about some marathon sessions to reconcile the approximately 50 differences in the current CBAs? We want and need action on the internal issues so we can get them to the table with Uncle Dougie.
Parker and crew stand to reap massive riches from the long term incentives and variable comp. Doug passed on his base income not because he was taking one for the team. He knows this year AAL is forecasted to earn almost $7B in profits. We are not willing to take another year of Parker saying, "I want to give you DL+7% but your union won't talk to me."
Maybe we need to do something like the Catholic Church and lock them in a room and don't let them out until they have the reconcilation complete.
The time for no excuses leadership in now.
As for the TWU, why hurry the grievance process now?700UW said:You do realize the Presidents on your side also process grievances, as do many on the IAM side?
The facts are the TWU refused for months to meet with the IAM, sorry if you dont like it, but thats the reality of the situation.