iluvaa,
Well I will agree to disagree. The issue is one of accountability. How has your situation improved? Has every effort been expended on getting us the few financial incentives in the current CBA? No, the gain sharing grievance was filed by Don V but it appears that since it's something DV worked for that even if it means more money in our pockets, since he is associated with it, they aren't for it. Even if it means putting more dollars in your pocket. The retiree prefunding, if DV was the one that was involved why not find out what was said about getting us that match. Do you care if they don't like DV if it gets more money in your pocket? You shouldn't.
My disdain is for the lack of focus and the fact that I want someone in the locals working for us and not for them. They said that is what they would do but that actions are not showing that. How do I come to that conclusion? When Wroble cut the company paid union spots they had an emergency board meeting to make sure they wouldn't have to come to work and get paid, when the single local was happening they all got together to fight it until they got in, when it came to getting the bylaws passed that mainly dealt with raises for themselves they made sure that went through without a membership vote. I want them to fight just hard for us in getting more money in our pockets now as they do for themselves, that's all.
And look at my past posts, I am all for Rojas and Knapp running the local. They get stuff done in MIA. DFW is being mismanaged but as long as the DFW gang of three get their scam then it's okay.