700 ?insp89 said:700, How long do you think it will take to negotiate a new contract that will cover all maintence employees ?
[post="306645"][/post]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
700 ?insp89 said:700, How long do you think it will take to negotiate a new contract that will cover all maintence employees ?
[post="306645"][/post]
700, How long will it take to negotiate this transition agreement ?700UW said:There is not a new contract negotiated, just a transition agreement.
[post="306683"][/post]
You are incorrect again. if the Teamster would win the vote the IAM contract would only be ineffect till the teams contract is done.700UW said:You are not correct.
The IAM contract would remain in effect and even the Teamsters acknowledged that on their web page.
When AMFA won at NWA, the IAM contract remained in effect until a new one was negoatiated.
When AMFA won at UAL the IAM contracted remained in effect until concessions were taken in bankrutpcy.
When AMFA won at WN the IBT contract remained in effect.
Don't let the facts get in your way.
[post="306586"][/post]
Hey I do want the last word in here hehe.....USAirways should not contract all all the work for sure!!!!!!!! My wife has lost her job due to this after 21 yrs. of this bull. And also she is only 40 now and moving on.NeedForSpeed said:BRAVO!!!!!BRAVO!!!!!!! Even though it is very obvious that this is indeed swayed to a particular side......In over 17 years associatied with the IAM, I have NEVER seen the IAM write ANYTHING comparable to this....It is obvious that the Teamsters at least have people who can speak the english language, and present issues in a no BS manner!!!! This post is not meant to explain a vote for one VS the other, merely to state that it is obvious the Teamsters' have a much more educated group of individuals capable of handling a very tough situation.....
Well done, DesertRat!!
[post="306864"][/post]
NeedForSpeed said:BRAVO!!!!!BRAVO!!!!!!! Even though it is very obvious that this is indeed swayed to a particular side......In over 17 years associatied with the IAM, I have NEVER seen the IAM write ANYTHING comparable to this....It is obvious that the Teamsters at least have people who can speak the english language, and present issues in a no BS manner!!!! This post is not meant to explain a vote for one VS the other, merely to state that it is obvious the Teamsters' have a much more educated group of individuals capable of handling a very tough situation.....
Well done, DesertRat!!
[post="306864"][/post]
700UW said:September 26, 2005
Dear US Airways Sisters and Brothers,
It is the position of the Machinists Union that employee groups should be merged based on the individual’s date of entry into a particular classification at their respective carriers. In our opinion, this recognizes the seniority of employees at both airlines and is the only fair way for everyone involved. This is how seniority integration was handled at PSA Airlines and Piedmont Airlines.
As this process moves forward, you can be assured that the Machinists Union will always protect the best interests of the membership.
Sincerely and fraternally,
William O'Driscoll
PRESIDENT-DIRECTING
GENERAL CHAIRMAN
DISTRICT LODGE #142
Randy Canale
PRESIDENT-DIRECTING
GENERAL CHAIRMAN
DISTRICT LODGE #141
[post="305837"][/post]