Why the hell is everyone blaming me for his actions? I was suspended before myself, and it was because of my own actions and a post that I made and was considered by the moderators to be worthy of suspension and warn status, not because someone "turned me in" or reported that post. The guy made his bed and I didn't put him in it. He was pushing the limit on the identity of others issue which is the same violation I committed and he put himself on suspension. He was even inlcuding some threats along with identification of others.
No big deal, he will be back, just as I was. He and everyone else just need to leave the identity of others issue alone and stop violating that policy.
Everyone cannot see another users
warn status, but you can see your own if you have been warned
TWU Informer
Veteran
Registered Member
5,946 posts
1 warning points
It is typical Industrial Union thinking to believe that nobody should be held accountable, and that rules are made to be broken. When someone breaks the rules and is caught, then they all blame it on someone else. Just like murderers and molestors who lawyers claim their parents are responsilble. And now the Industrial Unionist even use that thought process as a campaign/debate tool on this forum. Very professional! That is what you get with Teamsters, TWU, and IAM, no rules, unaccountable professionals, and then unable to compete in this industry. Then they want you to vote YES on concessions to save jobs. Their motto is "lower the pay and benefits" but never hold us all accountable. That is Pathetic and Wrong!
You are the epitome of an AMFA leader. One who criticizes and complains about others, and dismisses their own
SAME actions as justified. You responded to my first several posts with threats and name calling and even reduced yourself to trying to hit me with religious connotations. You created a personal attack on me, and along with Ken Mac Tiernan and Buck, lambasted me for not identifying myself. Why do you need to know who I am? Is it so AA Pittbull can "meet me face to face" because he disagrees with my opinions?
For my part, I have slapped right back at all of you and have no worry about any face to face meeting. Hell, I'll even buy the first round. We have all been guilty to some degree. You point fingers but discount your own actions. Like a typical AMFA leader you hide behind words like Democracy, Solidarity, and Integrity, but never really demonstrate those values.
Democracy - Sometimes the majority is simply wrong. It takes a real leader to stand up to the membership and do what is right for a long term solution. With the AMFA total Democratic process, how can anyone ever stand against a bad decision?
Solidity - At times, solidarity means standing for other work groups within your company or industry. AMFA comes out attacking all the other work groups for various reasons, then complains when these other Unions do not support them in times of need. You mock the big unions and criticize them for not helping your cause.
Integrity - Being able to listen to opposite opinions without bias or attack. You may or may not agree, but to personally attack the other for expressing contrary views speaks volumes to your personal lack of integrity. AMFA has historically gone on the attack mode at the onslaught of every election. Like you, they begin each attempted raid with a host of negative press about the current union, then again like you, cry foul when their own weaknesses are pointed out. You and your fellow supporters created and posted several negative threads and comments about every "industrial union" yet when I or others point out the problems with AMFA, you call it a fear and smear campaign, then proclaim the author as a liar.
Your lack, or failure, of these all important traits do not go un-noticed. I say again, AMFA failed in part because of people like you. Under an AMFA system, the loudest and most arrogant take the leadership roles over the most reasonable and qualified.
The common denominator of the AMFA leadership seems to be one of anger at the establishment. Anger on it's own, however, is not a leadership skill. I followed this movement once, but will not do it again.
