You took an opinion written by a lawyer, and disputed it's legal validity. I am not sure what it PROVES, other than you are one hell of a mechanic.
Your opinions and you are welcomed to them. I simply disagree with your conclusion.
YES!! The lawyer that you are so willing to post, that he is factual. It's in writing Anomaly, from the attorney that represents the exact union you are "trying" to support. I am not disputing it's legal intent. I am telling you what the NMB has defined as such. Call them, write them, E-mail them, they will answer your questions, if you ask in an appropriate manner. It doesn't prove anything Anomaly. But I will tell you this. When AMFA started their card drive here at SWA, I looked into any and all questions ask and put forward, just as you guys are getting hammered with at AA. It got so bad with the teamsters lies here at SWA, trying to fight off the AMFA drive, that they were their own demise. We all did in fact contact the NMB, FAA, City of Dallas, DOT, and there's more, but all the lies were very prevalent and they were removed in a record 2 week card drive.
BTW; My previous post is not a conclusion. You, as well as many others need to verify "anything" the teamsters tell you, or promice you. I am not your enemy brother, just trying to stop another airline from making a huge mistake with the teamsters. Matter fact, if nothing else keep the TWU. I would rather see you guys bring in AMFA, but by all means, if not AMFA, keep the TWU over the teamsters. Fair warning my friend...