robbedagain said:
as far as my grievance goes I know where it stands but let me ask you this.. what would an UN Unionized DL employee do if DL pulled that crap on you? What recourse do you have? This is one of the reasons why I personally would love to see a union whether its the IAM or whatever get voted in at DL so that those folks there would have a say in the matters voting etc etc etc
robbed, first of I was not aware that you personally were involved in a grievance and I am very, very sorry to hear that.
I'm not sure if you are willing to share the nature of it (details aren't necessary but a key word such as attendance, illness, OJT, accident or something that) but if you are willing to share, I would be interested in knowing.
and know, ABOVE ALL, that I hope from the bottom of my heart that I hope it all works out and you are find to be without fault and whatever has been withheld etc from you is quickly returned.
I genuinely mean that.
but, is it possible that your bias toward a union is in part due to the current situation you are in?
WeAAsles said:
No Union is going to be able to protect you completely from the scourge of outsourcing your OH work to other countries. It's been covered on this site a million times.
Unfortunately barring a major catastrophic crash due to shoddy unsupervised maintenance work the outsourcing will more than likely continue? The flying public is reactive rather than proactive.
You can blame your union (ANY) as much as you like but I have seen them try to shine the spotlight on the issue. People just don't seem to care though?
and yet job protection is one of the key claims that unions make.
I agree with you on this but if unions can't really stop outsourcing, then they have lost a major claim that they make,
And evidence with the airline industry as well as elsewhere in corporate America such as the automotive industry says that unions have had very little ability to improve job protections over time.
yes, the UAW delayed the process but in time jobs were outsourced.
Kev3188 said:
DL most certainly has internal appeal processes that do work.
Part of involves the Open Door policy.
I will tell you right now that I would not have completed the career I did if a low level manager early on had succeeded at what they wanted to do during 7.5 based on his interpretation of DL policy.
I picked up the phone, called the office of a VP and had my problem resolved THAT DAY.
And that manager ate crow.
The process is more refined and documented today but the notion that DL employees are at the whims of mgmt. are simply not accurate.
And further, DL still has to follow the law and is also subject to wrongful termination lawsuits which have ended up in the courts.
The notion that DL is free to do what they want while unions can protect the jobs of people that would have been fired at other companies is just not accurate.
Kev3188 said:
Me too. Worth every nickel, IMO...
no one would NOT have a union if it only cost a nickel.
but DL employees have repeatedly been asked to give up a dime or a quarter to get a nickel's worth of service; their pay and compensation is above average - not just average as it was for years.
The hurdle that labor unions have to overcome is higher than ever.
The price DL employees would pay for the "privilege" of having a union is beyond what most will pay.