WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #2,971
yes, DL employees were protected in other stations in a process that was no different than what other legacy airlines have offered with the exception that displaced DL employees were generally not allowed to bump other employees out of a location/job that was not impacted.700UW said:Until a JCBA is negotiated, the same thing happened at US when HP laidoff pilots they could have went to the East.
The FAs didnt lose their pay, vacation or benefits.
Can you say that when DL closed DFW, MCO, MEM, CVG and any other base?
we've been thru that discussion before. some call it "just the way the union does it" but DL people have repeatedly said they are not interested in having a system where they can be displaced from a stable job/location because someone else's city is not providing the economic basis for remaining staffed as it is.
if a majority is good enough to elect a president (even with a non-popular vote), why shouldn't be stick to the concept of a majority when discussing representation elections?Kev3188 said:Even on here some users can't help but use trigger words like "minority" or "small disgruntled group." For the most part-and certainly in the case of the F/A's- the results speak to different dynamic.
We can hold to the strict covenants of majority/minority if you want, but in reality, the lines are much closer to the center (and blurred).
I may have missed it, but did you post what workgroups of the 8 or 9 that voted as part of the merger, chose union representation?
seems like crushing defeat is entirely accurate considering how many unions were removed and the tens of thousands of union dues members that were lost.
YMMV
BTW, been to a soccer game this week? makes the world run a whole lot better.