yoyodyne
Veteran
southwind said:WHY DID IAM UNION MAMBERS VOTE OUT THE IAM AT BOEING?
One word...
BOHICA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
southwind said:WHY DID IAM UNION MAMBERS VOTE OUT THE IAM AT BOEING?
So are there different IAM organizations then or is the IAM that got voted out at Boeing the same IAM that is trying to get it's foot in the door at DL?700UW said:This is about the IAM campaign at DL, not the former vought plant in SC.
WorldTraveler said:can I ask you, Kev, if the reason for less movement than you expected is because people are not wanting to move, aren't meeting the requirements, there aren't as many jobs on the bid sheet as expected, or rampers are not being selected while others are - or is there some other reason?
Your perspective, but to a greater number of your co-workers it was a fight to remain unorganized and defend the direct relationship.Kev3188 said:The drive to retain representation at the onset of the merger...
The company...metopower said:Thanks... But who was promising that you could go back and forth? Was it the union or DL ?
No time like the present for the company to start a whisper campaign...BABABOOY said:The impending announcement regarding another retirement package.
This will only hurt their efforts.
BABABOOY said:As for inflight, the prevailing theme is that the IAM is trying to keep a sinking ship afloat with their finger in a hole. Cards
are quickly expiring and the focus has shifted to stemming the big losses by trying to convince flight attendants to re-sign. Close to
2 years now and over 20,000 + f/a's on property with more coming, I believe the sinking ship analogy is about right. I can't imagine
them even coming close to 7000 let alone the 10,000 +1 they need.
edit to add
to throw another wrench in the IAM's plans.
The impending announcement regarding another retirement package.
This will only hurt their efforts.