IAM Stepping Up campaign

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #196
1545168_10152152824249255_1036410344_n.png
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #197
Looks like Delta went with the police to stop the IAM supporters in ATL, too bad it didnt work:
 
Day 2 and once again it's great to see the IAM reps out here working hard in the cold. I noticed yesterday that management went with College Park police to and shut down the campaign. Fortunately management could not stop the guys from passing along information to employees. When I see a company try so hard to keep a union out that shows me we really need representation! Sign a card today ladies and gentlemen! It's for our best interest and also the interest of our families.
69061_10201304033390458_854545068_n.jpg
 
southwind said:
Detroit is broke and in the middle of filing BK............now if flights are down because people aren't flying to a broke assed city, should an airline remain fully staffed?
We're shifting the flying at DTW itself, not moving flying away from it. Do you not read our company website?



 
 
southwind said:
And has everything to do with not having to pay dues, to a 3rd party, in order to obtain employment!
Tellus more about the ones we often have to use to maintain our employment now:

Ingenix
Esis
Sedgwick
PeopleScout
Etc.
 
maybe because there are procedures to follow to access DL property and what can be done on it.

why should DL allow labor access to its property (DL pays the bill, not DL employees) but tell their employees they can't allow any number of other products and services to be sold by their employees.

If labor wants to talk to DL employees, labor can hire facilities and invite employees to drop in.
 
Kev thats indeed sad it makes it sound like dl treats their own like criminals if they so much dare to talk to unions that is just about what walmart (wally world) does all the time
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #204
“No carrier, its officers, or agents shall deny or in any way question the right of its employees to join, organize, or assist in organizing the labor organization of their choice and it shall be unlawful for any carrier to interfere in any way with the organization of its employees, or to use the funds of the carrier in maintaining or assisting or contributing to any labor organization, labor representative, or other agency of collective bargaining, or in performing any work therefore, or to influence or coerce employees in an effort to induce them to join or remain or not to join or remain members of any labor organization. ...” 45 U.S Code Section 152 (Fourth). Railway Labor Act
 
 
robbedagain said:
Kev thats indeed sad it makes it sound like dl treats their own like criminals if they so much dare to talk to unions that is just about what walmart (wally world) does all the time
criminal is taking someone else's property for one's own use without paying for it.

funny that 700 can argue about no free loaders in the representative process but labor itself wants to use facilities that DL paid for to conduct labor business.

yet another strategic fail by labor and 700 who remain the greatest antidote any DL employee needs to think about labor.

no, Kev, they don't follow access procedures.

robbed, tell us about US' access procedures. every large company has them. Kev can spend his Saturday morning finding DL's and post them (or a summarized form).
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #206
Spinmaster WT.
 
By law the union has to represent non-members, under the RLA and the NLRA.
 
So Federal Law lets pro-union supporters in the workplace as long as they follow the rules.
 
Are you wanting a police state where people have no rights?
 
And I was part of the the organizing campaign for US fleet, we had to follow the city rules than US, just like carriers have captive audience meetings and spend millions fighting unions.
 
US didnt give us a hard time on organizing, they knew the inevitable was going to happen, but we had to follow the city ordinances on hand billing.
 
Delta can claim or do what they want, they are a lease holder and the city owns the property and pro-union organizing is protected under Federal Law, why do you think they have to let the FAs set up tables in the work place as long as it doesnt interfere with the work?
 
So are you the Delta anti-organizing police?
 
So if the cops told Delta they can be there, how are they not following procedures?
 
Were you in ATL parking lot when that happened yesterday?
 
Do you have a SIDA badge and have access to the FA lounges?
 
Were you in AMS last week when the Pro-IAM FAs were there?
 
save the rubbish.

The organizers don't have permission to engage in organizing on DL property any more than a DL FA can set up a table selling Girl Scout cookies for her daughter.

The whole reason why the IAM set up shop in AMS is because the laws there are different and the IAM thinks they can advocate away from DL's influence.

DL FAs want nothing to do with labor and yet you can't respect what they have to say.

some of us will be happy to throw the last loads of dirt on labor's grave just because of you.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #208
Ok Mr everything expert,

How many organizing campaigns have you worked?
 
I have worked many, and the proof is in the pudding, the pro-IAM DL employees absolutley have the right to be in the workplace and that right is protected under Federal Law.
 
So you are telling the board, you know more than the Supreme Court, Congress, the Department of Labor, the National Mediation Board, DL's Labor Relations Dept, DL's Legal Department, the IAM and it Air Transportation and Legal Department and Ford and Harrison?
 
Hate to tell you this, but you dont.
 
So tell me how am I to blame if I am not a Delta Employee, I am not an IAM employee and all I do is post information on a message board?
 
You are truly ignorant.
 
Answer the questions in my previous post.
 
My pinky knows more about organizing than you do, as well as my 17 year old son, who helped his Mother and the IAM during the IAM/IBT election this past summer.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #209
WorldTraveler said:
no, Kev, they don't follow access procedures.
 
Prove your accusation, oh wait you cant because you make things up in your mind and you WERENT there.
 
Is this where you live?
 
article-1116547-030F1F32000005DC-451_468x313.jpg

So how does Mr Rourke treat you?
 
WorldTraveler said:
no, Kev, they don't follow access procedures.
Actually, they do. if they didn't, they why haven't any activist been cited or arrested? Further, why haven't any leafletting(s) been shut down?

The other piece here is that people are usually doing these things on either airport or public property. DL can get as mad as it wants, but if any given agency has granted a legal permit or access, there's nothing they can do. Both sides know this, yet the co. insists on continuing to sic law enforcement on it's own employees anyway. That is what I find so disappointing...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top