737823 said:
You and Kev can keep saying the UA agreement is of no consequence to US, DL or other carrier but that couldn't be further from the truth.
Josh
Actually, I've stated just the opposite, and stand by it. The UA T/A is IMO one of the worst things to happen to my industry in years.
That said, when the time comes, DL people will negotiate based on what is important to them; not what matters at US, what happened at HA, etc.
I'm just a crew chief on the ramp, and even I'm smart enough to not conflate the 2 concepts, how come you're not?
Look, I know you like to quote mine just to bait people into coming on here and correcting you, but it's not only disrespectful, it's f**king annoying. Maybe you think it's funny to mess with people. Maybe it's an intentional move designed to distract. Or maybe your mind is just terrible. Either way, stop it.
The least you could do is go back and find the post you have in mind and use it as a reference. I know you're capable of that.
737823 said:
What would an audit of the IAM show? Despite what you claim not all disbursements are indicated in complete detail on the LM-2s, if it is not a large disbursement it is not included.
Josh
Mosey on over to the DOL website and have a look-see for yourself.
Fair warning: It's a PITA to navigate. Not user friendly at all. Bring some patience.
737823 said:
PCE joined the IAM in 1999.
And Im talking about the change in the rules of how the votes are tabulated, where it is based on the people that actually vote, not the total size of the craft/class. If it was conducted under the pre-2010 the union would have lost.
Josh
Just for clarity, you're not against participatory democracy are you? Surely even you agree that only votes cast should count?
BTW, tell us more about a certain ATL-based carrier's influence in raising the hurdle to even getting to an election....