GoldenRam94
Senior
- May 16, 2007
- 443
- 0
So he's heard cases of dopers and professionals that throw a tantrum when they don't get what they want?
He is qualified to be a Union Rep In Philly then!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So he's heard cases of dopers and professionals that throw a tantrum when they don't get what they want?
One of my biggest gripes is the fact that the raise is not across the board. The M&R T/A gave the same % across the whole pay scale and 3% annual raises. The 3% might keep up with inflation but there is no way the 2% we were offered will. We would be basically accepting a pay cut annually. I feel if we accept this we are selling ourselves short. Even if we took the T/A another 1% on the annual raises would take us up to $21.38 by July 2012. Not only is it a POS its an insult also.JoeDirt,
I hear you man. Don't get me wrong, I have already admitted this is a POS contract. I also realize there are many scenarios you can come up with. I want to point out that my scenarios have all assumed senior topped out employees but if you look at the money the west employees not topped out are missing out on it is staggering. I would also like to mention that the west employees are out of the pension again for 2008 which cost us $$$thousands. And last but not least, the T/A that came out on 8-10-07 has the same top out as the T/A that came out 4-11-08. What makes anyone think that if we vote this down that the top out would change and if it did that it would make up for monies already lost.
P. REZ
JoeDirt,
Go back and look at the 8-10-07 and you will see the same pay scale across the board. Nothing changed. So if we vote no 8 months from now they come out with the same payscale?
JoeDirt,
Go back and look at the 8-10-07 and you will see the same pay scale across the board. Nothing changed. So if we vote no 8 months from now they come out with the same payscale?
[/quote
The truth of the matter is now is precisely the right time to vote no. P Rez, why vote yes if you know a merger is coming, most likely before June 1?
regards,
That TA isn't worth the paper it's printed on if there is a merger with COC because all will revert back to the "Pay Parity" clause for those who gave up monies. Get back is 2%-2%-2% and everyone gets 3% on july 1 2008 plus Language on 12/31/2008.
Al give us what we deserve and you can have what you need and you can live HAPPILY EVER AFTER..................
That's not necessarily true. Im sure there will be a transition process where Rich Delaney may immediately replace Randy Canale and then Rich can form his negotiations team. Remember, Rich and several others on our slate are already DL officers.I keep hearing aobut how Canale is gone in 40-50 days. Assuming he's voted out (which I expect) he's still there until OCTOBER, right? He won't go away overnight, and the incoming team won't have any power until then.
give us what we deserve
nothing is given , we must fight for everything , begging won't win the day .
PR,
Did you not negotiate that contract in 1999. Why did your group ratify
a contract with wages as poor as that. All we are fighting for is what is
fair. The positives in no way offset the negatives. If this were a extension
of your TWU contract I can see your position. But it is not. We are being
asked to take concessions to integrate members who accepted the pay
rate they are at. We were pounded in bankruptcy court and are being
asked to give again.
We only hope that the west understands that what we want are improvements
but not in exchange for jobs and not at a three for one exchange rate.
Thanks