I.A.M VS I.B.T
- Thread starter AIRCRAFTMECHANIC
- Start date
Bird Doctor
Senior
I would like to keep this thread to post that have FACTS/LINKS to back up what you say.
Please backup your post.
Please backup your post.
ahh,we been doing it for weeks now but you keep posting misinformation which forces us to research (mostly on the teamsters 104 website) and show where you are misinformed.
and i might add it is being noticed.
starting a new thread won't change your slanted facts.
and i might add it is being noticed.
starting a new thread won't change your slanted facts.
Bird Doctor
Senior
YES I CAN never said it wasn't a merger.
Pinocchio
Can you understand that there are different types of mergers like differant types of apples???
you keep splitting hairs......its a merger like the kind that makes NMB rule single carrier.
i called NMB and talked to the same person you did...they said you were reading the wrong areas and making misinformed interpretaions.
Bird Doctor
Senior
I have linked most of my post for people to go and read for there selfs. We can not say the same for you and Pinocchio. Point made right here asked that only post with links PLEASE
http://www.nmbfacts.com/RepManual-Index.htm >>read 9.0 and 19.0
http://www.nmbfacts.com/RepManual-Index.htm >>read 9.0 and 19.0
AIRWOMAN
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2005
- 3,440
- 0
I don't totally agree nor do I totally disagree with you as far as "successful participation reaps benefits to all who come." Maybe at one point in time or many points in time but it sure doesn't seem to be going in that direction right now. Because of the lowering membership, the power in numbers isn't there and neither is the participation. Very true.....times have changed and not necessarily for the better......in the lives of the working man and woman.
ok,ok...in all fairness.
I realize it must be terribly frustrating to post what you percieve or have been told is truthful information to have it continually thrown in your face by a couple of people you think are rank amatuers.
in the spirit of fairness and truthful sources i will now show where i get the information that continually discredits you and your efforts.
heres one place:
heres another place:
and yet another one:
and even here:
so you see,we're beating you with your own information...suggest you read before posting.
and I almost forgot this one:
WHERE WE LEARN THE ART:
I realize it must be terribly frustrating to post what you percieve or have been told is truthful information to have it continually thrown in your face by a couple of people you think are rank amatuers.
in the spirit of fairness and truthful sources i will now show where i get the information that continually discredits you and your efforts.
heres one place:
heres another place:
and yet another one:
and even here:
so you see,we're beating you with your own information...suggest you read before posting.
and I almost forgot this one:
WHERE WE LEARN THE ART:
Smartest Loser
Senior
- Jun 20, 2003
- 313
- 0
Precedent..?? Precedent..?? Is that the same kind of "Precedent" the IAM counted on when the judge threw out our contract...??"" Never has a judge thrown out an union aggreement,.never..""..says the IAM in March 2005..
If your gonna start telling people to base their opinions on "Precedent" then the IAM has lost the fight.
SL
Attachments
funny, i don't recall any judge ever tossing a contract at U.....said he would if company/union didn't come up with an alternative though.
twisting reality a little to fit your world?
Bird Doctor
Senior
As I have been tring to get across to all is that We will not have to live under the IAM contract tell 2009++ if the IBT win. Do you agree?
Under 19.602 http://www.nmbfacts.com/RepManual-Index.htm
The IBT contract is going good: http://www.teamsterslocal104.org/negotiations_summary.htm and
http://www.teamsterslocal104.org/Files/cur...t_1998-2003.pdf which has the scope for maintenance.
Why would you want to stay under IAM's contract tell 2009++?
Under 19.602 http://www.nmbfacts.com/RepManual-Index.htm
The IBT contract is going good: http://www.teamsterslocal104.org/negotiations_summary.htm and
http://www.teamsterslocal104.org/Files/cur...t_1998-2003.pdf which has the scope for maintenance.
Why would you want to stay under IAM's contract tell 2009++?
when a new union wins representation they "maintain" the previous contract until it expires then they negotiate their own.thats the way its been done....would have gone that way when AMFA tried to get in at U.you even pay dues to the "winning" union even though they have limited power other than maintenance of the existing agreement until expiration.
and your present negotiations can drag on forever under RLA...thats a given.
