Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think the company over-recalled FA's. They're too careful for that. If they recalled they did it because they have info not yet available to us; like the actual number of OVL's that will be returning.NewHampshire Black Bears said:AA "might" say, "well we're a "little fat" at the moment, but lets keep them working, rather than "re" furloughing them, only to have to "re-re" call them a couple of months from now" !!
MK;kirkpatrick said:I don't think the company over-recalled FA's. They're too careful for that. If they recalled they did it because they have info not yet available to us; like the actual number of OVL's that will be returning.
They have no problem dealing with small overages in headcount. They can adjust average flying hours up or down a little and offer mini-leaves and PVD's if they find themselves a bit overstaffed.
I think they recalled because they did their math and realize they really need the bodies. Let's hope for another recall around Dec 1, after the 777 arbitration has been paid off.
MK
I would feel a lot more comfortable with that theory if furlough pay were still in place. If these people are recalled 01JUL and furloughed 01SEP, it doesn't really cost the company anything other than a little employee goodwill. And you KNOW how important that is to them!NewHampshire Black Bears said:AA "might" say, "well we're a "little fat" at the moment, but lets keep them working, rather than "re" furloughing them, only to have to "re-re" call them a couple of months from now" !!
I agree that if US or UA went out AA would certainly fill in some of the gap in whatever way they could, and it would almost certainly mean recalls. But I wouldn't wish that on anyone, even to get my own job back.NewHampshire Black Bears said:Perhaps if there is a change(down) in the number of airlines(and I DON'T wish that on ANYONE), then there most likely would be recalls "up the ying yang".
I did that on my way to BOS last summer with the family in the van. Can't say it saved time or money, but it was fun.THANK GOD for the Orient point/New London CT. car ferry !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AA-has created a monster with this FMLA thing-thats why you always see adjustments to admin the program...employees in different states(CA for one) have challanged the company to the legality of their interpitation of the law.jimntx said:Well, as far as I can tell, AA's implementation of FMLA is questionable at best. I was in corporate America for several years after the passage of FMLA. I've never seen an interpretation of the law like AA's.
Basically, the FMLA--the law, not AA's take on it--says that an employer who offers defined benefits--such as sick leave--MUST give a full-time employee up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave per year for personal/family illness. However, (and this is where I'm confused by AA's approach) at other companies where I have worked, FMLA could not kick in until you had exhausted all accrued sick leave and vacation. In other words, the company kept you on the payroll as long as possible before putting you in the FMLA unpaid status.
Needless to say, this ain't the way it works at AA. And, I am still confused by the procedure. Maybe if I ever need it, it will make more sense.
May I ask why-you ask??F/Oaa said:just wondering, how many of the recalled f/a's are ex-twa?
FMLA implimentation is one area I have to applaud AA management. I needed to miss about 5 to 10 days for a minor surgery so my supervisor encoraged me to apply for FMLA. I was, of course, very suspisious simply because he recomended it. I kept thinking there must be something that benifits the company and is detrimental to me(typical cynical AA employee)!! I think I had two forms to fill out and my DR had to fill out and fax another to AA medical. It was approved pretty quick but I was told if nessessary it can be givin approval after-the-fact. I was allowed to burn my sick time on FMLA WITH NO PENALTY on my attendance record.jimntx said:Well, as far as I can tell, AA's implementation of FMLA is questionable at best. I was in corporate America for several years after the passage of FMLA. I've never seen an interpretation of the law like AA's.
Basically, the FMLA--the law, not AA's take on it--says that an employer who offers defined benefits--such as sick leave--MUST give a full-time employee up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave per year for personal/family illness. However, (and this is where I'm confused by AA's approach) at other companies where I have worked, FMLA could not kick in until you had exhausted all accrued sick leave and vacation. In other words, the company kept you on the payroll as long as possible before putting you in the FMLA unpaid status.
Needless to say, this ain't the way it works at AA. And, I am still confused by the procedure. Maybe if I ever need it, it will make more sense.
AAMech, your situation is just one of the ways that I was talking about where the company appears to have "twisted" the intent of the law. Now. all you seem to care about is the fact that no "occurrence" appeared on your attendance record. Yet, you say that you used "sick leave" while on FMLA; so, I'm assuming you were paid during the time off. This is NOT what the law says.AAmech said:FMLA implimentation is one area I have to applaud AA management. I needed to miss about 5 to 10 days for a minor surgery so my supervisor encoraged me to apply for FMLA. I was, of course, very suspisious simply because he recomended it. I kept thinking there must be something that benifits the company and is detrimental to me(typical cynical AA employee)!! I think I had two forms to fill out and my DR had to fill out and fax another to AA medical. It was approved pretty quick but I was told if nessessary it can be givin approval after-the-fact. I was allowed to burn my sick time on FMLA WITH NO PENALTY on my attendance record.
Where is Flyboy4u? How soon they forget now that he was called back. Well, I still wish him well.