southwind
Veteran
- Jan 22, 2008
- 7,709
- 3,928
Says the expert!Dog Wonder said:Ramble on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Says the expert!Dog Wonder said:Ramble on.
Wow. A political entity funding a poll? That is a revelation?La Li Lu Le Lo said:...
I have provided you an example of a political entity funding a poll on these forums....
...I could not care less if they said it or not....Who actually said it is irrelevant to me....
I wonder if we can extend this rational out a bit further. I've talked to one or two Christians who were a bit wacky so they must a be suspect. I have had one house that had issues so they must all be suspect......La Li Lu Le Lo said:
I am not saying all polls are manipulated but, if one is then they are all suspect.
Only a fool would deny what he has experienced himself because some poll told him otherwise.
Thats it Dawg:Dog Wonder said:Ramble on.
you really think it takes a long time to find idiots? its a 42 minute show... if it took a lot of tape to do it, it wouldnt be economical to shoot..Ms Tree said:I wonder if we can extend this rational out a bit further. I've talked to one or two Christians who were a bit wacky so they must a be suspect. I have had one house that had issues so they must all be suspect......
One or two samples out of several hundred thousand does not even begin to represent an accurate sampling for making any type of determination. The fact that one of your two samples came from a TV interview makes.it even more suspect. When Letterman does his "man on the street interviews" do you think they are all as stupid as the ones shown on the show? How many do they need to go through to get to the idiot on the screen?
You would have to be a fool to take 2 samples and think that sample is representing of anything. That fact that you use that as your reality with out a shred of supporting evidence is not surprising.
La Li Lu Le Lo said:I could not care less if they said it or not. It is the message I agree with. Who actually said it is irrelevant to me. I am not the one who quoted them anyway I simply dropped a picture of a message I agree with. If you have an issue with the quote being incorrect or fabricated take it up with the person that made the picture.
La Li Lu Le Lo said:I once spoke for over two hours with a welfare recipient in his 20's. According to him being on welfare has allowed him to "pursue his interests and realize his dreams". His philosophy is noone should have to work unless they want to. He believes that it is perfectly fine for him to "benefit" (mooch) off of the taxpayers because people who work for a living are "pursuing and realizing their dreams", so it is perfectly OK for him to benefit because they are happy. He has invented his own perception of reality and tailored his logic to fuel his own selfish desires, in other words a typical libtard.
His dream was to play video games at a competitive level by the way. That is how he justifies sitting at home all day playing PlayStation and computer games.
Again, I could care less if they said the quotes or not, it was the message I agreed with. By all means though, keep harping on a subject that amounts to nothing. You reek of pettiness sir.777 fixer said:Yeah right. You saw those fake quotes and jumped on it because you were to intellectually lazy to ask yourself did they really say that. Most of your posts make this rather obvious.
Keep using that libtard filter there 777.777 fixer said:Your story which may or may not be true proves nothing.
It is his special way of demonstrating intellectual superiority.What is with the "libtard" thing? It seems that every person who you disagree with is called that.
Because morons don't care whether or not they are true?While the quotes in question may be false no one has mentioned the reason for their staying power.