traderjake
Veteran
- Aug 30, 2002
- 5,669
- 9,308
Perhaps a semantic issue or my lousy informed memory......but not quite how I remember it going down.
The Shuttle arbitration was closer to relative position.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perhaps a semantic issue or my lousy informed memory......but not quite how I remember it going down.
That quote doesn't prove your point. There's risk in ANY position that USAPA takes. She didn't say you would win anything. She did say (read your quote) "It is free to do so" when talking about abandoning the Nic.
You lose with your own quote. If that's the best you have, better give it up now.
So you think a similar way would be carving out all the current and future 777/787 jobs for the AA pilots would be fair? (disbelief)Nicolau slotted by equipment and status, it was not relative position on the overall seniority list.
That in my opinion is the most fair.
So you think a similar way would be carving out all the current and future 777/787 jobs for the AA pilots would be fair? (disbelief)
And since no E190's exist at AA that those spots should be on the bottom?
So you think a similar way would be carving out all the current and future 777/787 jobs for the AA pilots would be fair? (disbelief)
And since no E190's exist at AA that those spots should be on the bottom?
Again, Dave, for your lack of legal comprehension of the MOU REREAD the LAST COUPLE OF SENTANCES:Cherry Picker;
First of all there is a combined list that met all the conditions set forth by the new US Airways. It was delivered and accepted by Doug Parker. Second, Mr. Parker sent out a letter stating that he has the list in his possession, and that it conformed with his conditions. I have a copy if you want to read it again.
Here is the "end-run" below. Could you please cherry pick exactly what your are speaking about? Please show your work....
4. It is the intent of the Parties that, as of the Effective Date, the terms and conditions of employment for pilots employed by New American Airlines and US Airways will be set by the MTA (as defined in Paragraph 1(a)) and in accordance with the process specified herein. The Parties further understand, however, that it will take some period of time for those terms to be implemented. Accordingly, except for those terms specifically identified in Paragraph 3, the Parties agree that each term of the MTA shall be applicable to all US Airways pilots at the earliest practicable time for each such term, and such terms, when applicable, shall govern and displace any conflicting or wholly or partially inconsistent provision of the former US Airways pilot agreements or the status quo arising there under. Once the MTA has been fully implemented, it shall fully displace and render a nullity any prior collective bargaining agreements applicable to US Airways pilots and any status quo arising there under.
Don't bother. There is no case law that supports your contentions.Oh brother, where do I start?
Bean
Your belief that Mr Nicalau got it even remotely right with awa/AAA merge is why I obviously asked. I think the APa boys would lol in your face at the mere mention of a Nic similar award handed to USAPA.
Please elaborate why you believe me wrong.
APA and USAPA all got played by both Parker and Horton. Largest airline in the world with the lowest labor cost of the big boys.