jimntx
Veteran
But I dont think AA enforces that rule too often.
I will repeat again what I have said before. AA has the loosy-goosiest computer security I have ever seen in a major corporation. When I was at Texaco, we had major computer centers in New York, Bellaire, TX, Hamburg, Germany (there was another one in the Orient somewhere, but I'm getting old and don't remember for sure). All of these major centers were linked to each other and to individual Texaco offices. A single computer user could be logged on at one terminal in the entire system at a time. You can go into Ops at any base and log on to every single terminal in succession using the same userid and password.
Another no-no from the computer security bible: Walking away from a terminal while still signed on. At Texaco and other companies where I worked, this was a termination offense in and of itself. A person bent on sabotage could do a lot of damage and it would all be recorded under your logonid. Most people don't know that it is built into every IBM mainframe computer (and most other major computers) that the computer automatically records every transaction under a given logonid including date and time of the transaction.
And, those are just two of the most glaring breaches of security I've observed. Operaations you are correct that AA does not enforce its own rules. They have created a lot of the problems we currently have because of failure to enforce rules in the past. A perfect example is the case that I think you or Gar posted about the f/a who has called in sick every Christmas and Thanksgiving for the last 5 years because she doesn't have the seniority to hold those off. If the company wants to stop such behavior then go after the miscreants instead of making life miserable for the rest of us.
The problem is that the company may have let such behavior go on too long. There is a precedent in labor law called "Shop Practice."
It works both for and against the union and the company. For instance, our contract calls for mandatory 12-hour rest break between trips when on reserve. If the union consistently allows the company to violate this provision of the contract, and the company can prove that, it can result in that aspect of the contract being declared null and void in a grienvance because less than 12-hour breaks is "shop practice."
By the same token, the company will not win a termination grievance for violation of computer security rules if it can be proven that the company has consistently ignored such violations in the past.