You still don't get it as you cannot comprehend. When it is all said and done it will not cost SWA a dime. Getting rid of the 717's will pay for themselves.
yes, it did cost WN $100 million.
WN believes long-term that the cost of single fleet type has better economics but WN most definitely paid to get rid of the 717s
the option would have been for them to park them and keep paying for them or to return them to Boeing and break the contract. Since WN is one of Boeing's best customers, it is certain that WN asked Boeing to let them break the leases which undoubtedly resulted in WN being told now.
making economic sense long-term doesn't mean it cost nothing.
and, again, in your one track mind can't understand why another carrier can make money doing something that WN doesn't choose to do.
DL's DAL schedule requires 2 717s. That leaves 86 more to use elsewhere on their network.
you might also know - or not - that DL had 717s in ATL-EWR while UA was using RJs. UA decided to upgrade to mainline and DL returned the route to M80s like most of their large business market.
DL and WN both can and will put planes where it makes the most economic sense.
not sure why you can't accept those strategies might look different but end up at the same levels of profitability.