City of Dallas tells Delta it can no longer fly out of Love Field

[eolesen]

You can hope that there might be a push to go to common use and eliminate preferential use, but I suspect you'd be alone in that desire.

I'm sure you also think DL would willingly give up all the backdrop automation and other enhancements they've made at ATL and allow that entire facility to go to common use, eh?

Common sense dictates why WN accommodated DL -- they had the available gate time, and acted in good faith (something foreign to you, perhaps?) with their landlord.

Come January, WN's fully allocated. UA's gates are also full. VX gates will definitely be full. There won't be any good faith left.

I'm sure you'll tell us how it will all pan out. Frankly, I could care less at this stage. My airline's interests are covered.

 

[WorldTraveler]

common use and common sense go hand in hand. which is probably why you don't understand the concept.

no one requires 100% common use.

yes, it will all work out much to your chagrin and professional embarrassment. just like your predictions about DL's demise in ATL.


DL will be at DAL...

do you like cheese with your eggs?

 

[swamt]

common use and common sense go hand in hand. which is probably why you don't understand the concept.

no one requires 100% common use.

yes, it will all work out much to your chagrin and professional embarrassment. just like your predictions about DL's demise in ATL.


DL will be at DAL...

do you like cheese with your eggs?

WT Delta will be at LF ***"TEMPORARILY"***  Do you understand this?  Can you comprehend?  Can you grasp this issue?  Once 1-6-2015 arrives Delta will once again have to fight for their presence at DAL LF.  Delta will in fact have to file a suit in order to remain at LF after 1-6-15.  UNLESS---As I have always said they work out some kind of agreement to wiggle their way to stay with UAL at their gates, Virgin at their gates, or even SWA IF and only IF they decide not to use the one gate being sub-leased to SWA from UAL at full capacity.  I still believe that Delta will in fact be asked to leave as there will be no room for them to continue operations, unless a different scenario comes to light for Delta to remain.  Your arguments for Delta to be allowed to stay are so far fetched and false that it's pathetic.  As I have said before, let all this bull **** go to rest until the time comes.  But Noooooo, you simply cannot do that WT, and you will not let that happen, you always must be out here in the spot light.  But, I will tell you one thing, you have "NO CLUE" what the hell you are talking about when it comes to DAL, LF, SWA, or any agreements that the 5PA or the post W/A and "common" whatever you think you know.  You have been constantly proven wrong by so many posters I have lost count.  
Your posts mean nothing, your ideas go nowhere, your BS goes no further.  Your done, people are tired of your rants that mean nothing at all, you constantly repeat, repeat, repeat and repeat again, and your always wrong.  Get a clue, never mind, you never will, because you are who you are...

 

[WorldTraveler]

will you eat that bull #### when DL is at DAL on 1/7/2015 with photos displayed on this site?

 

[AirLUVer]

will you eat that bull #### when DL is at DAL on 1/7/2015 with photos displayed on this site?

He gave you two reasons that DL will be able to stay at DAL, but I guess comprehensive reading is not your strong suit.

DL can stay IF:

1. DL successfully negotiates a sublease for gate time and space.

Or

2. DL files a lawsuit and WINS that lawsuit. The question there is who do they sue - the CIty of Dallas or the Federal Government.

Gate restrictions at DAL are codified in US Federal Law otherwise known as the Wright Ammendment Reform Act of 2006. Google it and educate yourself.

 

[WorldTraveler]

we've discussed the DAL issue ad nauseum.

Nothing has changed. I still stand by my position that DL will be there. I obviously will have to admit I was wrong if DL is forced to leave and chooses not to file a lawsuit. I doubt seriously that others will admit they were wrong but it will very likely be shown within weeks that they are.

regarding Dallas, Paulding County, GA, the community itself has said they don't want commercial service.

 

[swamt]

He gave you two reasons that DL will be able to stay at DAL, but I guess comprehensive reading is not your strong suit.

DL can stay IF:

1. DL successfully negotiates a sublease for gate time and space.

Or

2. DL files a lawsuit and WINS that lawsuit. The question there is who do they sue - the CIty of Dallas or the Federal Government.

Gate restrictions at DAL are codified in US Federal Law otherwise known as the Wright Ammendment Reform Act of 2006. Google it and educate yourself.

I'm done with him.  Just by him asking the question you responded to 100% confirms my post of him, he is freakin pathetic...

 

[WorldTraveler]

but it's ok for you to continually post that DL won't be at DAL even though multiple people including have said to leave the subject alone until there is more information?

It clearly isn't in the way you think but WN execs view this as a pragmatic issue.... they could shut DL out, risk a lawsuit in which there is a real high chance that major portions of the 5 party agreement could be find to be incompatible with US antitrust and airport access laws, and instead have chosen to operate the ATL flights they announced, let DL do the same, and focus on what they know will make money which is the vast majority of the DAL flights that are guaranteed to work without trying to push DL out.

again, will you admit that you were wrong since you have gone on and on and on trying to argue that I am wrong?

I will certainly be willing to do so if DL is pushed out of DAL and walks away without a fight but I doubt very seriously that will happen.

for now, DL is still operating DAL flights and selling flights beyond its WN sublease.

 

[swamt]

but it's ok for you to continually post that DL won't be at DAL even though multiple people including have said to leave the subject alone until there is more information?

It clearly isn't in the way you think but WN execs view this as a pragmatic issue.... they could shut DL out, risk a lawsuit in which there is a real high chance that major portions of the 5 party agreement could be find to be incompatible with US antitrust and airport access laws, and instead have chosen to operate the ATL flights they announced, let DL do the same, and focus on what they know will make money which is the vast majority of the DAL flights that are guaranteed to work without trying to push DL out.

again, will you admit that you were wrong since you have gone on and on and on trying to argue that I am wrong?

I will certainly be willing to do so if DL is pushed out of DAL and walks away without a fight but I doubt very seriously that will happen.

for now, DL is still operating DAL flights and selling flights beyond its WN sublease.

Wrong WT, completely wrong.  YOU are the one that continuously carries this on.  I vacated for awhile and YOU continued all by your lonesome to post about it.  I only responded because YOU are the only one trying to keep it going.  I was the one that recommended to let it rest until we all hear more.  YOU also have it wrong again, as I have posted 2 to 3 reasons why Delta could possibly be allowed to stay at LF.  Once again YOU completely twist crap up and cannot comprehend and understand what I post.  That is ok though as it is expected of YOU.  YOU need to get a clue man. Keep posting, the more YOU do the more YOU look like an idiot...

 

[eolesen]

Don't worry. WT and Rachel Maddow both have a need to have the last word.

 

[FrugalFlyerv2.0]

will you eat that bull #### when DL is at DAL on 1/7/2015 with photos displayed on this site?

 
Looks like you're unhinged.  Again.
 

again, will you admit that you were wrong since you have gone on and on and on trying to argue that I am wrong?

I will certainly be willing to do so if DL is pushed out of DAL and walks away without a fight but I doubt very seriously that will happen.
 

 
^^^
That would be something new, as you have not been previously able to do so.

 

[WorldTraveler]

nobody is unhinged.

some of the people who have participated in this discussion might well be on Jan 7, 2015 when they find out that DL is still operating from DAL.

Wrong WT, completely wrong.  YOU are the one that continuously carries this on.  I vacated for awhile and YOU continued all by your lonesome to post about it.  I only responded because YOU are the only one trying to keep it going.  I was the one that recommended to let it rest until we all hear more.  YOU also have it wrong again, as I have posted 2 to 3 reasons why Delta could possibly be allowed to stay at LF.  Once again YOU completely twist crap up and cannot comprehend and understand what I post.  That is ok though as it is expected of YOU.  YOU need to get a clue man. Keep posting, the more YOU do the more YOU look like an idiot...

I truly pit you that you can't listen to a different opinion than yours without having to call someone an idiot.

You are truly to be pitied.

in the meantime, how about we ask the moderators to lock the thread and every other one on the subject until something definite is decided regarding DL's future at DAL? not speculation by someone or another article talking about the subject but a definite thumbs up or thumbs down decision that either ensures DL is at DAL, is not, or notice of a lawsuit to resolve it.

 

[topDawg]

Don't worry. WT and Rachel Maddow both have a need to have the last word.

ha now i get the Rachel commits. 
 
E-1
WT-0 

 

[WorldTraveler]

E's cute remarks and attempts at score keeping are nothing more than an attempt to distract from the fact that he will be wrong about this issue.

The only consolation for him is that he will have a lot of company.

As if being collectively wrong is supposed to somehow be more honorable than being wrong all by oneself.

 

[AirLUVer]

As has been repeated before on this topic.

DL will be out of DAL ONLY if

they cannot get a sublease from a lease holding carrier

OR

if they file and WIN a lawsuit to stay or an injunction.