Overspeed said:
I've argued these point sin the past. We all know the banter between us. I believe I'm right as you do as well.
The fact remains we have a CBA in place. Like it or not the point is that the industry comparable language is good for the membership. It protects them in the event another union gets a better deal.
Just don't sell it as something it isn't, with our work rules, vacation, Holidays, Sick time, and Health Benefit cost it will bring us up, but we will still be at the bottom. If anything it protects the company from a mass exodus and an inability to hire as much as it helps us.
As far as Don, that issue is in the past.
Not really, we have to live with what he did till 2018, even though there may be an opportunity to make changes with a JCBA what we have now will still affect what we are able to recapture then.
He is out of your way so stop trying to deflect the fact the only thing you guys have done was ramrod a fat raise for yourselves and got the Baker letter language back so you guys don't have to go to work. The same thing you complained about Don and his buddies doing. We don't see our officers from 591 to answer our questions.
The money, that really bothers you. Yes its pretty good and I appreciate it, comes out to 9 hours OT per week. If you can get enough people to vote for you then you can give up working OT and put in a lot more hours doing this job, or not, you could be like a certain FORMER International appointee and take selfies at the bar or restaurant to put on facebook when you should be working but that probably wont get you re-elected and the work would pile up quickly. So go and make a motion to cut the pay to what you think it should be at the next meeting. Then you get to vote online for it, that's one thing we did get in place. You can vote the same way you post and throw out your attacks-online anonymously. Turnout with the online voting has been over 80% of the electorate. When have you ever seen that? You probably like it better the old way where five guys vote on something that affects hundreds. I believe this made our Local more Democratic than any other Local has ever been here at AA. We also got to have control over our grievances heard on the system board, no longer will system grievances be sacrificed because a few appointed people would rather that we lose so they can blame the bad result on the people who brought the grievance forward. It was pretty bad, many Locals were hesitant to bring system Grievances forward because of Internal Union politics, I heard in one case the Arbitrator ruled against BOTH the panel members and in favor of the grievant! Would I like to get on the floor more? Yes, I didn't have a problem as President when they pulled the UBB because with negotiations over and a very productive efficient E-board there was much less traveling and I had more time to talk to the guys, and post here. That obviously annoyed the crap out of you because you kept bringing it up, like you do now with the pay. But with all the work its not easy to get the time, plus what exactly are you looking for? Do you feel that all the officers should be on the floor daily in DFW and ignore the 21 other stations? Gary has been visiting a few class II stations as time allows and we do quarterly meetings in the five hubs. Don did a one time tour to fill the guys with false information where he claimed that our contract was better than Continentals and we made more once benefits were thrown in-I was able to correct that. We do have cell phones and Email addresses so you do not have to see us to contact us and ask questions, we can answer you in DFW from wherever there is phone service or an internet connection. I do expect that over the next few months I will have more time and hope to get to the floor more here in the NE, especially LGA, who knows, maybe even see me in DFW. Right now, along with the regular treasurers duties I'm still working with the accountants to finally close out the audits on the five Locals that were shut down as well as I told you before, having a system to make it easier to track the dues payments of 4300 members spread across 22 stations. How does that help the members? Easy, shouldn't everyone pay if anyone pays? Oh and by the way, the bylaws that Don put in place said this was a full time job, he did get that right, so regardless of who pays what I would still be off the clock, I didn't ask to be taken off the bid, the company requested it, I would rather bid because as you know things can change quicker than anticipated. Again, I complained about appointed people, such as Don and his buddies, one who already made it official and went into management, who were unaccountable to the membership making decisions for the membership and advocating concessions that they did not have to live under. I was voted in by a membership vote, can be voted out by a membership vote, can be recalled by a membership vote and do not advocate concessions, I know this job is a privilege and that I will have to live under those concessions as well. If you cant see the difference then you have more problems than I already suspected.